The second question: Kinetic Friction

AI Thread Summary
A 65.0 kg person jumps onto a 10.4 kg sled, resulting in a combined velocity of 3.5 m/s after the collision. The sled and person then coast 30.0 m on snow before coming to rest, prompting the need to calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction. The work done by friction equals the kinetic energy lost, and the frictional force can be expressed as f = μmg. Participants emphasize that the problem is primarily energy-based rather than acceleration-focused, suggesting the use of work-energy principles. Understanding that work is the product of force and displacement is crucial for solving the problem.
nutster
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
A 65.0 kg person, running horizontally with a velocity of +4.06 m/s, jumps onto a 10.4 kg sled that is initially at rest.
(a) Ignoring the effects of friction during the collision, find the velocity of the sled and person as they move away.

Which I figured out was 3.5 m/s...now my question:

(b) The sled and person coast 30.0 m on level snow before coming to rest. What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the sled and the snow?

Any suggestions on how to go about solving this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work done by friction must be equal in magnitude to the kinetic energy of the sled-person system but opposite in sign for the object to be at rest after displacing 30m.

Knowing work is equal to Force \times Displacement you can then solve for friction which then allows you to obtain the coefficent of kinetic friction.
 
How should I calculate the horizontal force, to be able to calculate F=ma? What is the acceleration?
 
The only horizontal force should be friction unless someone is pulling the sled-person system. Is it asking for an acceleration?
 
Not directly...you can see I'm lost here. I do well visualizing things with equations...maybe that'd help..?
 
nutster said:
What is the acceleration?

Thats exactly the question u should ask yourself.
Bring the three kinematic equations into your mind at this point.

-- AI
 
Don't worry about accelerations. You can if you want but it will make the problem more confusing to you I imagine. It is just an energy problem.

The thing to remember is that the f = (W \times {\Delta x}) = {\Delta KE}

Also, remember f=\mu{mg}.
 
Ahh, there's my hangup...how do I calculate work, and is the quantity of dX just 30m?
 
gokugreene,
i too like nutster can't see what you are actually trying here?

Btw, nutster
you can use v^2 = u^2 + 2as to get acceleration since u have v,u and s
I suppose once u have 'a' , u know what to do

-- AI
 
  • #10
Yes, the change in x is 30m.

Tenali, he is looking for the coefficient of kinetic friction.

You can find the coefficient of kinetic friction using the kinematic equations as Tenali suggested, but that isn't the way the problem is meant to be worked, but it will work.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
nutster said:
Ahh, there's my hangup...how do I calculate work, and is the quantity of dX just 30m?

We use dX to represent a very small displacement. Work is the integral of the component of force in the direction of dX. In this problem, the force is the frictional force, and it is constant. That makes the integral very simple. The work is the constant force times the total distance the sled moves against that force, resulting in negative work done by friction on the sled.
 
  • #12
gokugreene said:
Don't worry about accelerations. You can if you want but it will make the problem more confusing to you I imagine. It is just an energy problem.

The thing to remember is that the f = (W \times {\Delta x}) = {\Delta KE}

Also, remember f=\mu{mg}.

You of course meant to say

W = (f \times {\Delta x}) = {\Delta KE}
 
  • #13
Yes, thanks for the correction!
 
Back
Top