The self-dual connection in LQG

  • Thread starter Thread starter Perturbation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection Lqg
Perturbation
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
I'm reading Carlo Rovelli's book "Quantum Gravity". In the second chapter he writes down the Plebanski action by performing a decomposition of the complex Lorentz algebra into self-dual and anti-self dual parts, i.e. so(3, 1, C)=so(3, C)\oplus so(3, C). I sort of appreciate this fact and what it has to do with the connection, but I don't really understand this in any great depth. For example, why the complex algebras, why into two copies of so(3, C) etc.? I get the rest of the derivation of the action, I just don't get why this decomposition works.

Thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Great book!

It's just a math trick -- shuffling around the degrees of freedom. The obvious thing to do is use a real so(3,1) connection, with 6 degrees of freedom (per direction). But it turns out we can instead use a complex so(3) connection, also with 6 degrees of freedom, and build a map from one connection to the other. So everything we might want to do with one connection we can do with the other, and the map back and forth let's us translate. Letting the so(3,1) connection become complex, and splitting it into self-dual and anti-self-dual parts, one of which can be mapped to a real so(3,1) connection, is how we build the map.

It's not all clear at first why converting to a complex so(3) connection might be a good idea. But this gets developed more in Chapter 4, and the rest of the book.
 
Oh, ok, thanks. Playing with the degrees of freedom had occurred to me; I just thought there might be some deeper reason for the decomposition that had something to do with representations or whatever.

And yeah, it really is a very good book. I got it for Christmas and I've really enjoyed reading it. Just started reading chapter four.
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top