The Solution Sets for linear equations in three variables

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a linear transformation problem involving three variables. The user initially struggles with finding the infinite solution set for the given transformation matrix. Suggestions include reducing the matrix to its reduced row echelon form (RREF) and expressing the variables in terms of a parameter. Ultimately, the user successfully derives the solution, concluding with the relationship y/3 = (z-2)/3 = (x+(5/3))/-14. The conversation highlights the importance of matrix reduction techniques in solving linear equations.
takercena
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is from Further Pure Mathematics by L. Bonstock S. Chandler and C. Rourke (question 11 pg 113). The question is find the set of points which are mapped to the point (1, -1, -1) by the transformation
<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc} <br /> 1 &amp; -2 &amp; 4 \\<br /> 3 &amp; 4 &amp; 6 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 3 &amp; 1 \\<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right) <br /> <br /> \right.<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c} <br /> x \\<br /> y \\<br /> z \\<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right) <br /> <br /> =<br /> <br /> \right.<br /> <br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{c} <br /> X \\<br /> Y \\<br /> Z \\<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right) <br /> <br />

2. The attempt at a solution
I found that the equation have infinite solution since the matrix will give 0 in column 1 by using reduction method. And that's the problem because I still don't understand how to solve the infinite solution problem. I try to compare from the example from this book,

x - y + z = 4
2x + y - 2z = 1
5x - 2y + z = 13

eq 1 and eq 2 give z = 3x - 5
eq 2 and eq 3 also give z = 3x - 5

and by substitution into the first equation
z = (1/4)(3y + 7)
Hence 3x - 5 = (3y + 7)/4 = z

Still, no success.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi takercena!

Nicely set-out problem … :smile:

I assume you've got to 5y = 3z - 2.

Now eliminate z from (say) the second line.

That gives you another equation for y. :smile:
 
Well you should post the reduced row echelon form of the matrix then we can help you more explicitly. As it is, all I can tell you is to first reduce it to the RREF form, then let one of the variables x,y,z be a parameter and try to express the rest in terms of that.
 
Well you should post the reduced row echelon form of the matrix then we can help you more explicitly. As it is, all I can tell you is to first reduce it to the RREF form, then let one of the variables x,y,z be a parameter and try to express the rest in terms of that.
<br /> \left( <br /> \begin{array}{ccc} <br /> 0 &amp; -5 &amp; 3 \\<br /> 3 &amp; 14 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 5 &amp; -3 \\ <br /> \end{array} <br /> \left|<br /> \begin{array}{c}<br /> 2 &amp; -5 &amp; -2 \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

By the way, I already get it. The answer is y/3 = (z-2)/3 = (x+(5/3))/-14. Thanks both of you
 
Last edited:
Back
Top