The speed of a metal wire on two rails with a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the dynamics of a metal wire moving on two rails within a magnetic field, particularly focusing on parts b) and c) of a homework problem. The participants analyze the relationship between electromotive force (emf), current, and the forces acting on the wire, applying Faraday's law and Newton's second law. There is confusion regarding the initial conditions and the nature of acceleration, with suggestions to solve differential equations to accurately describe the motion. The conversation also touches on the importance of resistance in the circuit and the calculation of terminal speed, emphasizing that the system reaches equilibrium over an infinite time frame. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of the problem and the necessity for careful mathematical treatment.
knowone
Messages
5
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I tried to understand the problem b) and c).[/B]
upload_2018-9-9_17-11-32.png


Homework Equations


Faraday's law: ∇xE = - ∂B/∂t
emf ε = Bdv
Force : F =ma, Lorenz's force F=q(vxB) ==> ma = IdB
Power : power of battery = εI, mechanical power of the wire = Fv

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I solved a), where the magnetic force on the wire is F = IdB = ma and the speed v = at = IdBt/m.
I'm now tried to understand b) and c). First, I assume the initial speed is 0 at t=0 when the generator is replaced by a battery. The battery's power is εI, and it must be equal to the power consumed by the wire which is Fv = IdBv. Then the speed of the wire is v = ε/dB.
Also using Faraday's law I get to the same conclusion : ∇xE = - ∂B/∂t >>> ε = -∂(flux)/∂t = Bdv
It doesn't feel natural. The battery is connected at t=0, and in no time there the wire goes at speed v=ε/dB? So I think it is nonsense. But I don't know where I choose a wrong way. Help me please.
I guess the answer to c) is that the current has to be 0, because when the terminal speed has been reached, there is no acceleration, then no force F=IdB=0. Am I right at this?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-9-9_17-11-32.png
    upload_2018-9-9_17-11-32.png
    40.5 KB · Views: 781
Physics news on Phys.org
In part (a), you cannot use ##v=at## because the acceleration is not constant. As the bar accelerates, the current ##I## is also not constant, but depends on the velocity which depends on time. You need to solve a differential equation for part (a). Start with Newton's 2nd Law in the form $$m\frac{dv}{dt}=IB~d$$and then use Faraday's Law to find ##I## in terms of ##v##. Put that back in Newton's 2nd Law and solve.
knowone said:
Fv = IdBv. Then the speed of the wire is v = ε/dB.
How do you figure? The variable "v" cancels out in the equation.

On edit: Ooops! I meant part (b) in what I wrote above, not part (a). Part (a) is correct because the rails are connected to a constant current generator.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps this thread is similar to (b) and (c) questions in your problem:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-inside-a-magnetic-field.952728/#post-6036839
In your problem (questions (b) anc (c)) there are a force due the constant potential ##\varepsilon##. In the above link the force is due to a constant gravitational potential near the Earth surface. Is a little bit different but I think above thread can help you.

kuruman, I've have been thinking about this problem from yesterday because it is hard. I don't know if in the (a) question there are a variable electric potential that compensates ##\varepsilon_inducc## and then Intensity really is a constant. I don't know.
Edit.
Also it is important the direction of circulation of Intensity, because the bar must be moved to the left in the picture.
 
alejandromeira said:
kuruman, I've have been thinking about this problem from yesterday because it is hard. I don't know if in the (a) question there are a variable electric potential that compensates εinducc\varepsilon_inducc and then Intensity really is a constant. I don't know.
I retracted my statement on edit. Part (a) is correct.
alejandromeira said:
Also it is important the direction of circulation of Intensity, because the bar must be moved to the left in the picture.
Why? The direction of the field is shown in the figure, but without knowing which way the battery is connected, one cannot figure out the direction of the velocity.
 
I says about the direction o velocity because the diagram, if the bar moves to the right it will crashes whit the generator. Ok. if the supports wires are so long this is not important.

knowone needs to calculate ##\varepsilon_{inducc}## that is related with ##v## (when he applies Faraday's Induction law). After that I think that he can try:
$$\varepsilon -\varepsilon_{inducc}=I·R$$
Then knowone can get Intensity, and put it into the movement equation that you has wrote above.
Then he will need to solve the differential equation.
Please if there are some mistake say me it. In my work problems do not are so hard.
 
alejandromeira said:
Then knowone can get Intensity, and put it into the movement equation that you has wrote above.
Then he will need to solve the differential equation.
Please if there are some mistake say me it. In my work problems do not are so hard.
Your reasoning is correct. Let's wait and hear what @knowone has to say.
 
kuruman said:
How do you figure? The variable "v" cancels out in the equation.

The power of the battery is εI and it equals Fv=IdBv. Thus εI=idBv and v= ε/dB
 
I solved these equations:
εbatteryinduced =IR, εinduced = vdB, and m(dv/dt)=IBd
Then I= (εbattery-vdB)/R, thus m(dv/dt)=Bd((εbattery-vdB)/R).

Using differential equation, v(t)=A(1-e-λt), where A = -εbattery/d2B2 and λ = d2B2/mR

Here we added a arbitrary constant R. I'm reluctant to use it because there is no specification about any resistance of the circuit.

If we are allowed to use the solution v(t), then what will be the time when the system arrives at equilibrium?
 
Last edited:
You do need R to express v(t). I believe it should have been given by the problem. Your expression for v(t) = A(1-e-λt) is correct. Clearly A is the terminal speed which should be positive. You can see that from the differential equation. At terminal speed, dv/dt = 0. What do you get when you solve for v on the right side to get the terminal speed?
knowone said:
If we are allowed to use the solution v(t), then what will be the time when the system arrives at equilibrium?
The time will be mathematically infinite but the problem is not asking for it.
 
Back
Top