The speed of light in a vacuum

francisco
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
the speed of light in a vacuum...

the speed of light in a vacuum is a true constant of nature, independent of the wavelength of the light or the choice of an (inertial) reference frame. is there any sense, then, in which einstein's second postulate can be viewed as contained within the scope of his first postulate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
francisco said:
the speed of light in a vacuum is a true constant of nature, independent of the wavelength of the light or the choice of an (inertial) reference frame. is there any sense, then, in which einstein's second postulate can be viewed as contained within the scope of his first postulate?

You have been reading sci.physics.relativity haven't you? This has been discussed regularly there and you know that the light postulate is not needed to formulate the Lorentz transforms.
 
Einstein's second postulate actually related only to the independence of the velocity of light on the velocity of the source - not the receiver - the independence of the velocity of the receiver relative to light follows from the first postulate.

Specifically, the second postulate is: "Any ray of light moves in the stationary system of coordinates with the determined velocity c whether the ray be emitted by a stationary or moving body.."
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
312
Back
Top