The Sun treated as a perfect Black Body

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total intensity of the Sun's radiation and its temperature by treating it as a perfect black body. The thermal energy incident on Earth is given as 1.4 kW/m^2, prompting questions about the relevance of the Sun's radius and distance from Earth in these calculations. Participants reference the Stefan-Boltzmann law, noting that the incident power decreases with the square of the distance (inverse-square law). They explore the relationship between the Sun's radius and temperature, concluding that the temperature can be derived from the power output and surface area. Ultimately, the calculations yield a temperature approximation for the Sun's photosphere, aligning closely with known values.
Keiner Nichts
Messages
13
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


At lunch, the Sun's thermal energy incident on the surface of the Earth is 1.4 kW/m^2. Given the radius of the Sun, R, distance from Earth, r, and treating the Sun like a perfect black body, calculate the total intensity of its radiation and determine its temperature.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea which formula to actually use. I've attempted applying Rayleigh-Jeans and Planck's derivation of it but I simply cannot see how R and r come into play. Perhaps as integer wavelength conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're given the thermal energy incident on the Earth. How does that play into r, the distance from the Sun to the Earth? What happens to the incident power if r changes?

Knowing that the Sun outputs a constant amount of power, what has to happen as R varies?
 
  • Like
Likes Keiner Nichts
I know the given power is proportional to T^4 through the Stefan-Boltzmann law but I was not really taught the formula for how the incident power changes with r. I imagine it would be proportional to (1/r)^2? Also, temperature of the Sun would be proportional to either (1/R)^2 or (1/R)^3 for constant output, I think...
 
Keiner Nichts said:
I imagine it would be proportional to (1/r)^2?

The inverse-square law, that's right. So why is this law important? What's happening as the distance changes?

Keiner Nichts said:
Also, temperature of the Sun would be proportional to either (1/R)^2 or (1/R)^3 for constant output, I think...

Ah, but why? What's important about the radius of the Sun? Where exactly is the light emitted from?
 
  • Like
Likes Keiner Nichts
Oooh, ok, so it's only emitted from the surface. Now...if I were to consider the output as constant, it means that the given value in the beginning, let's call it P, would satisfy: P×4πr^2=P'×4πR^2 where P' is what I need to find. And then through Stefan Boltzmann I divide it by the constant and raise it to the power of 1/4 to find out the temperature at the photosphere. I hope that is correct...
 
What do you get if you do the math?
 
Well, for the temperature I got the Sun's temperature at the photosphere (or a very good approximation at least, I got the real value from Wikipedia), so I imagine the total intensity is good as well. Thank you a lot!
 
Back
Top