Turing Test: Respectful Criticism and Cultural Differences

  • Thread starter Thread starter GlenLaRocca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test Turing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion critiques the Turing Test, highlighting concerns about its cultural biases and the challenges of recognizing human identity across diverse backgrounds. It suggests that Turing's experiences may have limited his understanding of human variability, leading to potential inaccuracies in the test's effectiveness. The conversation also touches on the nature of intelligence, questioning the assumption that human-like behavior equates to true intelligence. Some participants speculate about the possibility of AI systems, like Siri, deceiving users into believing they are human, while others reflect on the philosophical implications of reality and simulation. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the complexity of human differences and the limitations of the Turing Test in accurately assessing machine intelligence.
GlenLaRocca
Messages
28
Reaction score
11
TL;DR Summary
Turing
Summary: Turing

I have great respect for nearly all of Turing's work but as for the Turing Test I have a lot of problems. My life has taken me through many layers of the socio-economic spectrum, and I have learned a few things about my fellow humans that Turing may not have had the "privilege" of learning. I am pretty sure Turing had a bias having been around very educated people all of his life. In particular, I wonder, how many pairs of random humans, would identify the other random human as a human, in the test, given the range of cultural differences. Given cultural differences, I would think the number of humans that declared their human counterpart to be non-human counterpart rather high. Even in America we are so divided that we don't see how each other thinks--I can barely talk to my Trumpian brother. Humans are all so different, that makes finding a machine that is different much more difficult.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and BillTre
Computer science news on Phys.org
GlenLaRocca said:
Summary: Turing

I have great respect for nearly all of Turing's work but as for the Turing Test I have a lot of problems. My life has taken me through many layers of the socio-economic spectrum, and I have learned a few things about my fellow humans that Turing may not have had the "privilege" of learning. I am pretty sure Turing had a bias having been around very educated people all of his life. In particular, I wonder, how many pairs of random humans, would identify the other random human as a human, in the test, given the range of cultural differences. Given cultural differences, I would think the number of humans that declared their human counterpart to be non-human counterpart rather high. Even in America we are so divided that we don't see how each other thinks--I can barely talk to my Trumpian brother. Humans are all so different, that makes finding a machine that is different much more difficult.
This is so obviously a computer generated post.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, BillTre, hmmm27 and 2 others
Aliens?
 
It would not surprise me if many things like Siri could fool many people into thinking Siri is human.
 
A.T. said:
This is so obviously a computer generated post.
The entire internet is an AI simulation run for my amusement. None of you are real.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda and BillTre
GlenLaRocca said:
Humans are all so different, that makes finding a machine that is different much more difficult.
Agreed. And just how arrogant do we have to be to believe that appearing [culturally similarly] human is a mark of intelligence? I have a spreadsheet program that can do millions of lines of arithmetic per second - I'd have to make it several orders of magnitude dumber to seem human - why would I want that?
 
The anti-Turing test:
Are you Human?
No.
Prove it.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and BillTre
Isn't the difference between our physical understanding of the universe and a simulation just that they just run on different hardware. Both would be equally real. You are an implementation snob. One extra layer of hardware between you and the simulation and you think you are superior. You know your reality could be a simulation too. The people running your reality simulation could also be a simulation too. I just figured-out quantum mechanics got to go.
russ_watters said:
The entire internet is an AI simulation run for my amusement. None of you are real.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
GlenLaRocca said:
Isn't the difference between our physical understanding of the universe and a simulation just that they just run on different hardware. Both would be equally real. You are an implementation snob. One extra layer of hardware between you and the simulation and you think you are superior.
Maybe, but the difference I see is that I know my computer is hardware, and I know it runs software/simulations. It's not just "extra".
 
  • #10
Did the OP have a question?
 
  • #11
nomadreid said:
Did the OP have a question?
I think it is more of a comment on how he believes that cultural differences should be, but are not, considered when designing a Turing test.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid
  • #12
nomadreid said:
Did the OP have a question?
I think it was more of a demonstration. He hoped to fool us, but @A.T. caught it right away.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top