The Units of a Position Vector in a Hilly Landscape

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the units of a position vector in a hilly landscape scenario. The position vector is expressed in terms of kilometers per hour and involves trigonometric functions, leading to questions about the differentiation process. Participants clarify that the units of the position vector should be understood as length, not speed, and address the negative sign in the differentiation of the cosine function. The original poster acknowledges their misunderstanding and expresses gratitude for the clarification. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding both the mathematical concepts and the correct interpretation of units in physics.
amcqueen
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My problem is not so much the mathematics of doing the question, but rather the units.

The question states: "A car travels across a hilly landscape with a position vector given in the x - z plane.

Position Vector = 30 km/hti + 1 km cos (t/(0.1h))k

How can the units for a position vector be given as km/h ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The units are not km/h, the units are that of km/h*t = Length/time * time = length.
 
ok, i see it now, thanks
 
I'm struggling with the maths side of this question. I've done some searching and came across an answer of v(t) = i30 - k10sin10t and I kind of understand this. I do not understand why the sin is negative though. Could anyone run through the differentiation of this?

Thanks!
 
Caldo120 said:
I do not understand why the sin is negative though. Could anyone run through the differentiation of this?
You're asking where the minus sign comes in when finding d(cosx)/dx? Have you studied calculus?

Try: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differentiation_of_trigonometric_functions"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
oh dear. apologies. I was flicking through my table of "INTEGRALS" and wondering why it didn't make sense. Thoroughly embarrassed.

Thank you though for showing me I must pay more attention!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top