Solving Vectors Word Problem: Ground Velocity of Airplane

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics4ever25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a vectors word problem involving an airplane's ground velocity affected by wind. Two methods yield different resultant velocities: Method 1 calculates 505.51 km/h, while Method 2 initially suggests 597.2 km/h due to a misinterpretation of the wind's bearing. The confusion arises from the term "from" in the wind's description, indicating a back bearing that should be adjusted to 300 degrees for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the correct resultant velocity, after correcting the bearing in Method 2, aligns with Method 1's result at 505.51 km/h. Understanding the concept of back bearing is crucial for solving such vector problems accurately.
  • #31
physics4ever25 said:
I guess I'll try to learn the components method as well then. Anyways, here's a sample problem (I already have solved it using method 2 and I got the right answer) that I'd like to solve using the components method:

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Question: An airplane is flying at an airspeed of 500 km/h, on a heading of 040 degrees. A 150 km/h wind is blowing from a bearing of 120 degrees. Determine the ground velocity of the airplane and the direction of flight.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The diagram: View attachment 96252
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I forgot to add the resultant but that would be just the missing side to form the triangle.
OK. If you put the tail of the blowing vector at the origin, what acute angle does the 500 km/h vector make with the positive x direction, and what acute angle does the 150 km/hr vector make with the negative x axis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Chestermiller said:
OK. If you put the tail of the blowing vector at the origin, what acute angle does the 500 km/h vector make with the positive x direction, and what acute angle does the 150 km/hr vector make with the negative x axis?

If I put the tail of the wind vector at the origin, then it makes an acute angle of 30 degrees with the negative x-axis, and the plane vector will make an acute angle of 50 degrees with the positive x-axis.
 
  • #33
physics4ever25 said:
If I put the tail of the wind vector at the origin, then it makes an acute angle of 30 degrees with the negative x-axis, and the plane vector will make an acute angle of 50 degrees with the positive x-axis.
Good. Now, from the picture, what are the signs of the x and y components of the 500 km/h vector?
What are the signs of the x and y components of the 150 km/h vector?
 
  • #34
Chestermiller said:
Good. Now, from the picture, what are the signs of the x and y components of the 500 km/h vector?
What are the signs of the x and y components of the 150 km/h vector?

For the wind vector, the x component would have a negative (-) sign and the y component would have a positive (+) sign. For the plane vector, the x-component would have a positive (+) sign and the y component would have a positive (+) sign.
 
  • #35
physics4ever25 said:
For the wind vector, the x component would have a negative (-) sign and the y component would have a positive (+) sign. For the plane vector, the x-component would have a positive (+) sign and the y component would have a positive (+) sign.
Excellent. Now, can you use trigonometry (with the angles 50 degrees and 30 degrees for the two vectors) to get the x and y components of each of the two vectors?
 
  • #36
Chestermiller said:
Excellent. Now, can you use trigonometry (with the angles 50 degrees and 30 degrees for the two vectors) to get the x and y components of each of the two vectors?

For the wind vector, the x component is 129.90 km/h and the y component is 75 km/h. For the plane vector, the x component is 321.39 km/h and the y component is 383.02 km/h.
 
  • #37
physics4ever25 said:
For the wind vector, the x component is 129.90 km/h and the y component is 75 km/h. For the plane vector, the x component is 321.39 km/h and the y component is 383.02 km/h.
The magnitudes of these components are correct, but you already said that the sign of the x component of the wind is negative. So, what is the x component of the wind, with the correct sign?
 
  • #38
Chestermiller said:
The magnitudes of these components are correct, but you already said that the sign of the x component of the wind is negative. So, what is the x component of the wind, with the correct sign?
It would be -129.90 km/h. At this point I would total the x components and total the y components to get a total of 191.49 km/h for the x components and a total of 458.02 km/h for the y components. This will form a triangle (for the totals) that will look as follows:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

upload_2016-2-21_19-21-36.png


____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The remaining side will be the resultant so I will use Pythagorean theorem to find it, so-
r=square root (458.02^2+191.49^2)
r=496.44

Therefore, the magnitude of the resultant will be 496.44 km/h. Now, in terms of the angle, I don't know which of the two angles will be the one.
 
  • #39
physics4ever25 said:
It would be -129.90 km/h. At this point I would total the x components and total the y components to get a total of 191.49 km/h for the x components and a total of 458.02 km/h for the y components. This will form a triangle (for the totals) that will look as follows:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

View attachment 96259

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The remaining side will be the resultant so I will use Pythagorean theorem to find it, so-
r=square root (458.02^2+191.49^2)
r=496.44

Therefore, the magnitude of the resultant will be 496.44 km/h. Now, in terms of the angle, I don't know which of the two angles will be the one.
What is the angle that the resultant makes with the negative x axis?
 
  • #40
Would it be the one on the lower right?
 
  • #41
physics4ever25 said:
Would it be the one on the lower right?
I don't know what this means. I get an angle of about 67.4 degrees between the resultant and the negative x axis.
 
  • #42
Chestermiller said:
I don't know what this means. I get an angle of about 67.4 degrees between the resultant and the negative x axis.
Yes, I got 67.3 degrees.
 
  • #43
physics4ever25 said:
Yes, I got 67.3 degrees.
OK. Now going around clockwise from North, the negative x-axis is at a bearing of 270 degrees (due West). That would be at 9 o'clock. But the resultant vector is even further clockwise than this, more towards 11 o'clock. So what is the bearing of the resultant vector?

Chet
 
  • #44
Would it be 337.3 degrees?
 
  • #45
physics4ever25 said:
Would it be 337.3 degrees?
Sure. Now we're done. Pretty easy, huh? Want to try another case?
 
  • #46
Chestermiller said:
Sure. Now we're done. Pretty easy, huh? Want to try another case?

Yeah, that wasn't as bad as I thought it was. Yes, sure, let's try another case. Here's another question (not plane/wind but it involves the same concept of vectors):

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

While on a search and rescue mission for a boat lost at sea, a helicopter leaves its pad and travels 75 km at N20E, turns and travels 43 km at S70E, turns again and travels 50 km at S24W, and makes a final turn and travels 18 km at N18W, where the boat is found. What is the displacement of the boat from the helicopter pad?

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
  • #47
physics4ever25 said:
Yeah, that wasn't as bad as I thought it was. Yes, sure, let's try another case. Here's another question (not plane/wind but it involves the same concept of vectors):

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

While on a search and rescue mission for a boat lost at sea, a helicopter leaves its pad and travels 75 km at N20E, turns and travels 43 km at S70E, turns again and travels 50 km at S24W, and makes a final turn and travels 18 km at N18W, where the boat is found. What is the displacement of the boat from the helicopter pad?

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
OK. So now you have 4 vectors. First draw your diagram with the tail of each vector at the origin. Then, what is the acute included angle that each vector makes with the x axis?
 
  • #48
upload_2016-2-21_20-34-13.png


This is very messy, so it may be hard to see what's what.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Vector 1 makes an angle of 70 degrees with the x-axis; vector 2 makes an angle of 47 degrees with the x-axis; vector 3 makes an angle of 66 degrees with the x-axis; and vector 4 makes an angle of 72 degrees with the x-axis.
 
  • #49
physics4ever25 said:
View attachment 96265

This is very messy, so it may be hard to see what's what.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Vector 1 makes an angle of 70 degrees with the x-axis; vector 2 makes an angle of 47 degrees with the x-axis; vector 3 makes an angle of 66 degrees with the x-axis; and vector 4 makes an angle of 72 degrees with the x-axis.
The angle for vector 2 is incorrect. Also, I recommend plotting each of the vectors with its tail at the origin. This will make it easier to figure out the components.
 
  • #50
Chestermiller said:
The angle for vector 2 is incorrect. Also, I recommend plotting each of the vectors with its tail at the origin. This will make it easier to figure out the components.
My bad, the angle for vector 2 (in relation to the x-axis) is actually 20 degrees. Also, just curious, why are we shifting the vectors such that the tail is at the origin (for this question and for the previous one)?
 
  • #51
physics4ever25 said:
My bad, the angle for vector 2 (in relation to the x-axis) is actually 20 degrees. Also, just curious, why are we shifting the vectors such that the tail is at the origin (for this question and for the previous one)?
We shift the vectors because it makes it easier to visually see the horizontal and vertical components, and the angles.

20 degrees is correct.

Now, for each of the 4 vectors, from what you see in the diagram, what is the sign of the x component and the y component.
 
  • #52
Chestermiller said:
We shift the vectors because it makes it easier to visually see the horizontal and vertical components, and the angles.

20 degrees is correct.

Now, for each of the 4 vectors, from what you see in the diagram, what is the sign of the x component and the y component.

For vector 1, x and y both are positive; for vector 2, x is positive and y is negative; for vector 3, x and y both are negative; for vector 3, x is negative and y is positive.
 
  • #53
physics4ever25 said:
For vector 1, x and y both are positive; for vector 2, x is positive and y is negative; for vector 3, x and y both are negative; for vector 3, x is negative and y is positive.
Excellent. Now get the x and y components of each of the 4 vectors, including the correct signs.
 
  • #54
Chestermiller said:
Excellent. Now get the x and y components of each of the 4 vectors, including the correct signs.

For vector 1, the x is 25.65 and y is 70.48; for vector 2, the x is 40.41 and y is -14.71; for vector 3, the x is -20.34 and y is -45.68; and for vector 4, the x is -5.56 and y is 17.12.
 
  • #55
physics4ever25 said:
For vector 1, the x is 25.65 and y is 70.48; for vector 2, the x is 40.41 and y is -14.71; for vector 3, the x is -20.34 and y is -45.68; and for vector 4, the x is -5.56 and y is 17.12.
These look right. Now, what are the components of the resultant? What is the magnitude of the resultant?
 
  • #56
Chestermiller said:
These look right. Now, what are the components of the resultant? What is the magnitude of the resultant?

Total x's would be 40.16 and the total y's would be 27.21.

Thus, the magnitude of the the resultant would be 48.51 (got this using Pythagorean theorem).
 
  • #57
physics4ever25 said:
Total x's would be 40.16 and the total y's would be 27.21.

Thus, the magnitude of the the resultant would be 48.51 (got this using Pythagorean theorem).
OK. What is the acute included angle between this and the x axis? What is the direction in terms of N??E
 
  • #58
Chestermiller said:
OK. What is the acute included angle between this and the x axis? What is the direction in terms of N??E

The acute angle would be 34.12 degrees. I don't know how to find the true bearing or the direction in terms of quadrant bearing.
 
  • #59
physics4ever25 said:
The acute angle would be 34.12 degrees. I don't know how to find the true bearing or the direction in terms of quadrant bearing.
The angle is correct. The bearing is determined by the hand on the clock again. It's at an angle of 56 degrees clockwise from North (about 2 o'clock). The quadrant bearing, according to the algorithm implied by the input data is N56E.

You did very well. I don't think you'll have any problems with the component method any more.

Chet
 
  • #60
Chestermiller said:
The angle is correct. The bearing is determined by the hand on the clock again. It's at an angle of 56 degrees clockwise from North (about 2 o'clock). The quadrant bearing, according to the algorithm implied by the input data is N56E.

You did very well. I don't think you'll have any problems with the component method any more.

Chet

I'm a bit confused by how you found the hand on the clock. For the previous question you determined that it was around 11 and for this one you determined that it's around 2. However, I don't know how to determine this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K