I The Units of the Cosmological Constant: eV^2

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
A question about the unit and the value of the cosmological constant
In natural units, it’s known that the unit of the cosmological constant is ##eV^2##.
I don‘t get why in this paper :

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.09016.pdf

page (1), it says the value of ##\Lambda \sim meV^4##, this means ##\Lambda \sim (10^6 ~ eV)^4 \sim 10^{24} eV^4 ##, shoud not the unit ##eV ^2 ## instead ?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because in natural units the dimension of the cosmological constant is energy^4 and it is not known that the dimension is energy^2.
 
Safinaz said:
Summary: A question about the unit and the value of the cosmological constant

In natural units, it’s known that the unit of the cosmological constant is ##eV^2##.
I don‘t get why in this paper :

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.09016.pdf

page (1), it says the value of ##\Lambda \sim meV^4##, this means ##\Lambda \sim (10^6 ~ eV)^4 \sim 10^{24} eV^4 ##, shoud not the unit ##eV ^2 ## instead ?

Safinaz said:
See for instance the discussion here:

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-the-cosmological-constant-without-units

Or this paper : https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0012253.pdf, equation (2)

They say the units of ##\Lambda## is ##eV^2 ## or equivalently in natural units ##cm^{-2} ## or ##sec^{-2}##
Ok, so the confusion is regarding ##\Lambda## vs ##\rho_\Lambda##. I was referring to ##\rho_\Lambda##, the energy density of the cosmological constant. The first paper you cite in the OP is discussing the scale of the energy density, the others discuss the constant appearing in front of the metric in the Einstein field equations. These differ by a constant ##8\pi G## and ##G## has dimensions energy^-2 in natural units.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and Safinaz
In such cases it's always good to go back to SI units first. From the Einstein equations you read off that ##\Lambda## has the same units as ##[G E]/(V^4 L^3)## (##G## gravitational constant, ##V## dimension of velocity, ##L## dimension of length). The gravitational constant itself has the dimension of ##[E] L/M^2## and thus ##[\Lambda]=1/L^2##. In "natural units" with ##\hbar=c=1## that means it dimension ##\text{eV}^2##.

A different way to see it is to realize that ##\Lambda c^4/(8 \pi G)=u_{\Lambda}## is an energy density (density of "dark energy"). Often you see also ##\rho_{\Lambda}=\Lambda c^2/(8 \pi G)##, which is the corresponding "mass density", i.e., ##\rho_{\Lambda}=u_{\Lambda}/c^2##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Safinaz, Bandersnatch, Ibix and 2 others
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top