Why Are Wenkel Engines Not Widely Used Despite Their Simplicity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter banerjeerupak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine
AI Thread Summary
Wankel engines, while praised for their simplicity and high power-to-weight ratio, are not widely adopted due to significant drawbacks such as high fuel and oil consumption, complex manufacturing challenges, and thermal issues. The engine's design leads to incomplete combustion and high hydrocarbon emissions, making it less viable in today's fuel-conscious market. Mazda utilizes Wankel engines in sports cars but still faces challenges with fuel efficiency and emissions. Additionally, issues like carbon buildup can cause engine seizure if not properly managed. Despite Mazda's advancements and patents, the overall performance and efficiency of Wankel engines remain inferior to conventional internal combustion engines, leading to their limited use in the automotive industry.
banerjeerupak
Messages
122
Reaction score
1
Why do we not use Wenkel Engines? THey are easy to build and use. Why do we not use them in the practical world. Or is there any component in which the wenkel engine is used and I'm not aware of?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
They're not as easy to build and use as you might have us believe, but we do use Wankel engines. In automotive applications, Mazda favour them for sports cars due to their high power to weight ratio, torque curves, and high revving nature.

The main reasons not to use them are their high fuel consumption, high oil consumption, and the more difficult engineering required in their manufacture (namely problems with sealing dissimilar metals at elevated temperatures, which partially causes the high oil consumption). The thermal problems are excarbated by the fact that the combustion chamber is not cooled by the incoming charge as would be with a reciprocating engine. Very high HC emissions are also a large problem, presumably due to the combustion chamber geometry intrinsically preventing complete combustion. Obviously the HC problem can be overcome by richening the mixture, allowing complete combustion to occur in the exhaust manifold following expansion, but with today's fuel costs this is just daft. Another major problem is that with some designs, carbon deposits can accumulate between the rotor seal and the crankcase, causing the engine to sieze if it's not allowed to fully warm through.

It should be noted that Mazda have managed to successfully address many of these issues, however, fuel consumption is still pretty hairy.

I'm still waiting to see the design for your non-reciprocating piston engine!
 
Last edited:
A source for the wankel engine

http://www.millville.org/Workshops_f/kess_mech/Kess_Wankel/wankel.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mmm. 11mpg on the autobahn.
 
Mazda also has a series of patents on the latest improvements that deter competitors from gaining ground

If you are interested look into some newer typers of engines being developed like the nutating engine and the quasi-turbine
 
quinn said:
Mazda also has a series of patents on the latest improvements that deter competitors from gaining ground

If you are interested look into some newer typers of engines being developed like the nutating engine and the quasi-turbine

It is the same old same old, if any of these engines were any better than the convetional ic engine why would the major manufactuers reject them?
give me a break, who rejects being the market leader?
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...

Similar threads

Back
Top