The wave function is an exponential function, if I plot the

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the wave function in quantum mechanics, particularly its representation as an exponential function rather than a trigonometric function. Participants explore the implications of this representation, the conditions under which different forms of wave functions arise, and the mathematical necessity of using imaginary components.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the wave function is not represented by a trigonometric ratio, noting that plotting the real part does not yield a typical wave graph.
  • Another participant explains that the wave function is a solution to the Schrödinger equation and can take various forms, including exponentials and sinusoids, depending on the system's energy relative to potential.
  • It is mentioned that in the WKB approximation, sinusoidal wave patterns occur for positive energy, while exponential patterns arise for negative energy.
  • A participant asserts that no real wave function can be a pure sinusoid due to normalization issues, emphasizing that wave functions should decay spatially to reflect particle localization.
  • There is a discussion on the imaginary nature of the wave function, with one participant stating it is for mathematical convenience and relates to using complex exponentials to describe wave amplitude and phase.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the representation of wave functions, with some supporting the idea that they can take various forms while others emphasize the necessity of decay and normalization. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the normalization of wave functions and the conditions under which different forms arise, but these aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.

LSMOG
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
The wave function is an exponential function, if I plot the real part of it, I don't get a wave graph like sine or cosine function, Why the wave function is not represented by a trigonometric ratio instead.
Also, the wave function cannot be plotted since it is imaginary, why is it imaginary?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave function need not be a pure sinusoid, but instead a solution to Schrödinger equation for the system in question which may be exponentials e.g. a free particle with energy higher than a constant potential or sinusoids (a free particle with energy lower than a constant potential) or a Hermite polynomial multiplied by Gaussian exponentials (a harmonic potential)... You might be able to convince yourself from Euler's equation that exponentials are very closely related to waves and even provide valid solutions to the standard wave equation.

The wave function cannot be plotted, in general, on the real axis alone. But any measurement you make using the wave function must be real and can be plotted on the real axis. The wave function is imaginary for mathematical convenience/necessity. It stems from using complex exponentials to compactly describe both the amplitude and phase of a wave.
 
In the WKB approximation, you get sinusoidal wave patterns where the energy is positive, and exponential patterns where the energy is negative.
 
No real wave function can be a pure sinusoid. The function f(x)=sin(x) or f(x)=cos(x) is not normalizable. It makes sense that real wave functions decay spatially since a particle is at least partially localized to some region of space. A particle should not be spread out throughout all of space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
950
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K