Theoretical or Experimental Applied Physics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of Applied Physicists, specifically distinguishing between Theoretical and Experimental Applied Physicists. Theoretical Applied Physicists typically focus on developing models and simulations to understand physical phenomena, while Experimental Applied Physicists conduct hands-on research to test these theories and explore practical applications. Both paths can lead to university research positions, but Experimental Applied Physicists may have a slight edge in securing research roles due to the hands-on nature of their work. Additionally, both types can become professors, with opportunities for side research, although the likelihood may vary based on the specific field and institution. The conversation also highlights that Applied Physics encompasses a range of disciplines, often blending with engineering, and can be categorized into theoretical and experimental branches, reflecting a spectrum of research approaches.
ElectricC
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I'm considering becoming an Applied Physicist. I just need some help. Here are the questions I would like answered.

-What would a Theoretical Applied Physicist research?

-What would a Experimental Applied Physicist research?

-Which one would have more of a likely hood of working in research at a university?

-Which one would have more of a likely hood of becoming a professor and having research on the side?

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Out of curiosity: What is a "Theoretical Applied Physicist"?
Google just gives 12 hits, 5 of them are some obscure non-english text, some sites list them as two different options and the first hit I see is this thread (google is quick!).

Do you have any specific field in mind, if you consider "applied physics"? Physics is applied in many different fields.
 
ElectricC said:
Hello everyone,

I'm considering becoming an Applied Physicist. I just need some help. Here are the questions I would like answered.

-What would a Theoretical Applied Physicist research?

-What would a Experimental Applied Physicist research?

-Which one would have more of a likely hood of working in research at a university?

-Which one would have more of a likely hood of becoming a professor and having research on the side?

Thank you :)

google applied physics research, standford, columbia, utexas, ucolorado, umichigan have full on phd programs under the name applied physics; they tend to be experimental condensed matter and nuclear physics and they mix with engineering but there's lots of other areas.
 
I was looking at Caltech's website and it said they have courses for both. So, it could just mean Applied Physics is put into one category?
 
I just looked further into this..Yeah, Applied Physics is both Theoretical and Experimental it seems.
 
ElectricC said:
I just looked further into this..Yeah, Applied Physics is both Theoretical and Experimental it seems.

Under my conception applied physics is more like physics engineering.
There're 3 division: theoretical, experimental and applied.
 
I see it more as a two dimensional space. One dimension is spanned by "Pure"/Applied. The other is spanned by Theoretical/Experimental. Each research project has its own value for how pure vs applied it is and for how theoretical vs experimental it is. There is theoretical applied physics and there is also experimental pure physics, and of course the other common combinations as well.
 
Back
Top