Theoretical physics after physics?

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a bachelor's degree in Physics (UCAS F300) without a specialization in theoretical physics does not preclude the possibility of entering a master's program in theoretical physics later. Many discussions emphasize the value of a well-rounded education in physics, suggesting that exposure to experimental physics during undergraduate studies can enhance understanding and skills beneficial for theoretical work. While some argue that a strong mathematical background is crucial for success in theoretical physics, others highlight that practical experimental skills can also be advantageous, particularly in collaborative environments. Ultimately, having a general physics degree allows for flexibility in career paths and the opportunity to explore various aspects of physics before committing to a specific field.
Bradwast88
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Theoretical physics after physics??

Hey all
I am going to do Physics bachelors course (UCAS F300).But i do like theoretical physics due to financial problems i cannot go any university which having theoretical physics courses.But i got a university which having only Physics courses i mean no theoretical physics.So i want to know is it possible to do masters in theoretical physics after get a physics degree (F300)??.I am an international student by the way

Thanks
Have a nice day
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Bradwast88 said:
I am going to do Physics bachelors course (UCAS F300).But i do like theoretical physics due to financial problems i cannot go any university which having theoretical physics courses.But i got a university which having only Physics courses i mean no theoretical physics.So i want to know is it possible to do masters in theoretical physics after get a physics degree (F300)??.I am an international student by the way

I think it's probably better if as an undergraduate you *don't* specialize in theoretical physics. If you want to be a good physics theorist, you need to understand the process of physics observation. This is hard to do as a graduate student, so as an undergraduate, it's a good idea to have lots of exposure to experimental physics.
 


twofish-quant said:
I think it's probably better if as an undergraduate you *don't* specialize in theoretical physics. If you want to be a good physics theorist, you need to understand the process of physics observation. This is hard to do as a graduate student, so as an undergraduate, it's a good idea to have lots of exposure to experimental physics.

I'd agree with twofish_quant if you actually want to become a professional theoretical physicist. However, if you just want to do a masters, I'd disagree.

Personally, I went from straight physics to theoretical physics - the experimental skills I picked up haven't helped at all with the course I am currently doing. In fact my shortcomings in mathematics have held me back considerably (but to be fair, the TP course I am doing is run by a maths department, so perhaps this is to be expected)
 


I'm currently in the final year of a four-year physics (UCAS F303) course, and will be going into theoretical physics after this year. I would like to add that taking the straight physics course doesn't necessarily limit you too much, as part of the four year course I had to do a two-year extended research project. At many (most?) universities, there will be a mixture of theoretical and experimental projects on offer, so I have participated in theoretical physics research for a year and a half now.

I'd also echo what two-fish quant says - the ability to understand and/or propose an experiment is invaluable to a physicist - whether experimental or theoretical. I've certainly found this skill useful, working in a group that has strong experimental links and absolutely invaluable in group seminars / school colloquiums and in suggesting ways to observe phenomena that I've predicted. As vertices says - the skills may not directly help with courses, but this doesn't mean they aren't useful.

Basically, don't worry about not specialising in theoretical physics. It also leaves some avenues open if you decide that actually theory isn't for you. Try and get some experimental experience anyway - I found it useful and gave me some real insight into the methods and problems associated with measuring real physics.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top