Theories of Relativity: Analogon

Neo
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
An interesting observation I made while in chemistry lab was that volatile liquids follow a type of "relativity theory." Imagine temperature (T) as the speed of light (C) in this thought experiment. So, as the heated water approaches T>100 degrees Celsius, the water converts to another state of matter -- gas -- before the temperature is reached (that is, it is a limit and so is never reached, similar to C).

Compare: The speed of an individual water particle cannot exceed 100 degrees Celsius whereas, in ToR, the speed of the particle cannot exceed C.

As more thermal energy [E] is added to the liquid, the rate of evaporation (dr/dt) increases, rather than T of liquid. Analogously, as particles approach speed C, only the rate of conversion of energy to matter increases, rather than particle speed after a certain point -- say 99.99% of C.

(dr/dt) increases as a function of E after a certain temperature threshold.


Some further ranting:

The particle possibly acquires wave-particle duality at that speed. Since mass is particulate and pure energy is wave-like, the particle seems to need wave-particle duality for the interconversion between matter and energy.

Could all particles acquire wave-particle duality when sufficiently accelerated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have some rather severe misconceptions about thermodynamics. To start with, temperature is a statistical measurement. It refers to the average kinetic energy of a particle in the substance. The average kinetic energy of a particle in a gas is

<E> = \frac{3}{2} k T

Many particles have smaller kinetic energies than this average, and many have kinetic energies larger than this average.

Furthermore, particles in the liquid escape the liquid to exist in a gaseous phase all the time. This is how evaporation happens.

The rest of your post in unfortunately just nonsense.

- Warren
 
Yes, but the particles with the highest energy evaporate first (consider evaporative cooling, e.g.). The point is that water cannot reach temperatures above 100 degrees Celsius because of the same type of problem in relativity theory with the speed of light. As the water particles approach the 100 degrees after being fed thermal energy, the ones with the highest kinetic energy convert to another state of matter (i.e., gas)
 
Yes, but the particles with the highest energy evaporate first (consider evaporative cooling, e.g.). The point is that water cannot reach temperatures above 100 degrees Celsius because of the same type of problem in relativity theory with the speed of light. As the water particles approach the 100 degrees after being fed thermal energy, the ones with the highest kinetic energy convert to another state of matter (i.e., gas)

You're not making any sense. Are you trying to prove that matter changes into a wave as it approaches the speed of light?

P.S. Water can reach tempertures above 100C without evaporating. Example: pressure cooker.
 
Entropy said:
You're not making any sense. Are you trying to prove that matter changes into a wave as it approaches the speed of light?

P.S. Water can reach tempertures above 100C without evaporating. Example: pressure cooker.


In the case of a pressure cooker or autoclave, you're just changing the threshold temperature by increasing the energy required for the water to evaporate, but not changing the phenomenon that I'm speaking of. The "100C" is arbitrary. The important point is that there is a certain threshold temperature that cannot be reached with respect to certain experimental conditions and that this temp. cannot be reached because the water converts to another state of matter. This phenomenon is upheld in a pressure cooker -- it's just that the temperature at which it occurs is different.

The same is the case of acceleration to light. After a certain threshold speed, you cannot accelerate more and the extra energy is converted to mass rather than speeding up the particle to C.


Also, how does energy applied to a particle convert to mass after the threshold speed (say 99.99+% C)? Imagine spinning a particle at the speed of light at an angle...what properties of the particle allow the interconversion between matter and energy? Does there need to be wave-particle duality?

For instance, why does light possesses wave-particle duality? Perhaps the particulate nature of light is due to its velocity. That is, it originally was only a wave but when extended over temporal dimension, it acquired wave-particle duality as an effect of its speed.
 
Neo said:
As the water particles approach the 100 degrees after being fed thermal energy, the ones with the highest kinetic energy convert to another state of matter (i.e., gas)
What you seem to be missing is that the water particles do this all the time, at all temperatures. Even ice does this.

- Warren
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top