Theories of relativity and the resulting E = MC^2

LitleBang
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Einstein"s theories of relativity and the resulting E = MC^2, although extremely important to physics, was not his greatest insight. His idea that time is not fixed, that it can run infinitely slow or possibly infinitely fast was the most important.

If there was a Big Bang, that suggests at one second after the BB then the universe had an edge. If that is true then the universe should have an edge now. The universe is expanding at an accelerated rate. Doesn't that imply that time at the edge now is much faster than at the BB?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


No, the topology of spacetime described by the big bang does not imply a bounded universe, even if the universe is finite. Consider a 2-sphere, it has a finite surface area, but no edges.
 


LitleBang said:
His idea that time is not fixed, that it can run infinitely slow or possibly infinitely fast was the most important.

I don't think he would agree with that.

LitleBang said:
If there was a Big Bang, that suggests at one second after the BB then the universe had an edge.

Not necessarily.


LitleBang said:
If that is true then the universe should have an edge now.

Again, not necessarily.

LitleBang said:
The universe is expanding at an accelerated rate. Doesn't that imply that time at the edge now is much faster than at the BB?

Not really.

I would suggest that it's probably better to learn what conventional theory says before theorizing yourself.
 


Also:
LitleBang said:
Einstein"s theories of relativity and the resulting E = MC^2, although extremely important to physics, was not his greatest insight. His idea that time is not fixed, that it can run infinitely slow or possibly infinitely fast was the most important.
The second is a component of the first!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top