Is Our Ancestral Math Overestimating Family Trees?

[Dremmer]

If we double the number of ancestors in each generation, 2 parents, 4 grandparents, and so on, we can see that by the time we are back 10 generations, we have the potential for 1024 ancestors. But is this true? If we were to go back to the time of Charlemagne, we would find we had the potential for 281 trillion (YES!) ancestors all living at that one moment in history. This is statistically impossible! So where did our ancestors go?

Incest. We still commit incest to this day and don't realize it.

 

[russ_watters]

Define "incest".

 

[Ryan_m_b]

Incest is sex with close relatives. I hardly thing sharing an ancestor 10 generations ago is close relative, by that logic all sex is incest and we have to now come up with a new term to describe sex with close relatives. pointless

 

[SW VandeCarr]

Incest is sex with close relatives. I hardly thing sharing an ancestor 10 generations ago is close relative, by that logic all sex is incest and we have to now come up with a new term to describe sex with close relatives. pointless

It's interesting that the Genesis account appears to require incest between siblings for the propagation of the human race. I pointed this out to my parents at a young age (11) and they looked at me like I was Rosemary's Baby (look it up if you're too young to remember this movie.)

 

[mishrashubham]

Incest only has grave biological implications (you know deformed babies and the such) till at the most a second cousin. By the time you reach a third or fourth cousin the shared percentage of genes becomes very less and mostly won't result in retarded offspring.

 

[Perfection]

This is why the world needs sex robots.

 

[JaredJames]

This is why the world needs sex robots.

Yes, because sex robots would be the perfect aid to reproduction and remove the whole problem of shared genes once and for all. In fact, once the current population dies off there wouldn't be much in the way of genes left at all...

 

[mishrashubham]

Yes, because sex robots would be the perfect aid to reproduction and remove the whole problem of shared genes once and for all. In fact, once the current population dies off there wouldn't be much in the way of genes left at all...

uh...what?

 

[JaredJames]

uh...what?

Introducing "sex robots" doesn't solve the supposed issue of incest. It could even make it worse.

Personally, I don't see there being a problem. As per previous posts, it's not that much of an issue unless they are close relatives. So said robots won't do anything.

 

[mishrashubham]

Introducing "sex robots" doesn't solve the supposed issue of incest. It could even make it worse.

Personally, I don't see there being a problem. As per previous posts, it's not that much of an issue unless they are close relatives. So said robots won't do anything.

You took that post seriously? I thought that was just a random and stupid joke.

 

[JaredJames]

You took that post seriously? I thought that was just a random and stupid joke.

It wasn't serious, it was a reference to a film which has this exact issue in a comedic sense. However, as you were confused I explained it.

 

[mishrashubham]

Well okay

 

[Perfection]

it was a reference to a film which has this exact issue in a comedic sense.

No it wasn't.

The key is to make cyborg children.

 

[mishrashubham]

No it wasn't.

The key is to make cyborg children.

The key to what? Since you seem pretty serious about this, tell me how would this help? And how do you hope to accomplish this? I am still assuming this isn't spam or a joke.

 

[JaredJames]

No it wasn't.

Ah, so you know what I was referencing and I don't.