Thermal efficiency: reversible and irreversible machines

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
DavideGenoa
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
In the proof of Clausius inequality ##\oint\frac{\delta Q}{T}<0## for an irreversible cycle, I always find the fact that the thermal efficiency of an irreversible machine is **stricly less** than the thermal efficiency of a reversible machine, both operating between temperatures ##T_H## and ##T_C##.
Nevertheless my book and all the resources that I have found prove by reductio ad absurdum that, between the temperatures ##T_H## and ##T_C##, the thermal efficiency of an irreversible machine is (only) **less or equal** to the thermal efficiency of a reversible machine because, if it were strictly greater, the positive work done by an irreversible thermal machinee could be used to activate a reversible machine used as a chiller, and the resulting composed machine would produce a flow of heat from a cold source at the temperature ##T_C## to a hot one at the temperature ##T_H##, violating the second principle of thermodynamics.

How can it be proved that the thermal efficiency of an irreversible machine is strictly less than the thermal efficiency of a reversible machine operating between the same two temperatures ##T_C## and ##T_F##?
##\infty## thanks for any answer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have machine A exactly at the ideal efficiency, you can use another ideal machine B to revert the system to the previous state. Or just run A backwards. Your irreversible process is now part of a reversible process => contradiction
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DavideGenoa
Brilliant answer! Thank you very much!