Thermal Equilibrium: 0.50kg Ice & 1kg/2kg Boiling Water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the thermal equilibrium achieved when 0.50kg of ice is added to boiling water, with a focus on how the mass of the boiling water affects the time to reach equilibrium. When 2kg of boiling water is used instead of 1kg, the final equilibrium temperature is higher, leading to a longer time to reach thermal equilibrium due to the increased energy required to raise the ice's temperature. The heat transfer rate into the ice remains consistent because the heat flux is proportional to the temperature difference, which stays the same. However, since more energy is needed to reach the higher final temperature, the time to achieve thermal equilibrium will differ. The thermal time constant is thus considered variant with respect to the total energy in the system.
mengshuen
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Sorry to trouble all of you here again, but

Imagine that there is 0.50kg of 0 degree ice added to 1kg of boiling water.

after a few minutes they achieve thermal equilibrium.

however, instead of adding 1kg of boiling water, now I add 2kg of boiling water, keeping the mass of the ice constant, will they take a different time to reach thermal equilibrium, taking into account that the temperature after thermal equilibrium is achieved is different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One needs to show some work or effort.

A key point - keeping the mass of the ice constant - means constant heat transfer area. Heat flux is proportional to temperature difference - that it still the same.

What is different is the equilibrium temperature and the total energy in the system.

Is the thermal time constant variant or invariant with respect to the total energy or total mass in the system?
 
I am guessing that it will take a different time to reach thermal equilibrium, hence the thermal time constant would be variant to total energy in the system.

Are there any equations for me to find out the rate of thermal energy transfer/loss to the ice, with only the mass, and temperature difference known? The question also requires one to calculate what would be the difference in time to achieve thermal equilibrium.
 
Well one way would be to 'look at it from the perspective of the ice'.

The mass of ice is the same! In one case the mass must achieve one temperature, while in the second case, it must get to a higher temperature.

The key then is to show that the rate of heat flow into the ice is the same or not. If the heat flow is the same, then it takes longer to get to the higher temperature.
 
Can I say that the heat flow is the same, as in the relationship in thermal conductivity? If I understand correctly, the power given off by the boiling water is proportional to the temperature gradient. So now there is the same temperature gradient, and hence rate of energy transferred is the same. More energy is required to get the ice to a higher temp, so more time is needed.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top