Thermal expansion over a large temperature range

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the thermal expansion of materials, particularly steel, over a large temperature range from approximately 1200°C to between 10-25°C. Participants explore the implications of using average thermal expansion coefficients versus integrating the thermal expansion formula, as well as the appropriate temperature units for calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that integrating the thermal expansion formula may yield better accuracy over a large temperature range compared to using an average thermal expansion coefficient.
  • There is a discussion about whether temperatures should be expressed in Kelvin or Celsius when integrating the thermal expansion formula, with differing opinions presented.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of using accurate values for the thermal expansion coefficient, especially for smaller volumes, and suggests conducting experiments to compare results using averaged and integrated values.
  • Another participant points out that the linear equation of thermal expansion is valid only for small values of ΔT and that the equation must be integrated correctly to apply over a larger temperature range.
  • Concerns are raised about the form of the thermal expansion coefficient α(T), particularly if it is expressed as a polynomial, and how this affects the units used in calculations.
  • Participants note that the cooling procedure can influence contraction when the material is in the plastic range, leading to further inquiries about the mechanisms involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on whether temperatures should be expressed in Kelvin or Celsius for the integration of the thermal expansion formula. Additionally, the impact of cooling procedures on contraction remains a topic of exploration, with varying perspectives on its significance.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the exact forms of the thermal expansion equations and the implications of different temperature units on the calculations. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity on the conditions under which the thermal expansion coefficients are valid.

Eric MIlburn
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
So I've been working at a steel mill where we deal with billets cooling from temperatures around 1200 C to between 10-25 C. I have access to average thermal expansion coefficients over this temperature range.

First question: Over a large temperature range as aforementioned am I correct in assuming it is better to integrate the thermal expansion formula rather than taking an average value for the thermal expansion coefficient?

Second question: When integrating the thermal expansion formula am I correct in assuming (as is usually the case) that I should use temperatures in Kelvin?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I should clarify that the average expansion coefficients are averaged over various steels, not the temperature range.
 
Most thermodynamics formulas were worked out in Kelvin and hence you should either look for the modified version in Celsius or simply convert your temperatures to Kelvin. As for the expansion coefficient, the accuracy of the values becomes more important (over the averaged one) the smaller the volume. It is not clear from your post what sizes are you dealing with exactly, but if you wants absolute accuracy, don't use the averaged value, or do a solid scientific experiment and run a couple of identical ones (one with an averaged value for C and one with an integrated value) and compare the two.
 
Eric MIlburn said:
So I've been working at a steel mill where we deal with billets cooling from temperatures around 1200 C to between 10-25 C. I have access to average thermal expansion coefficients over this temperature range.

First question: Over a large temperature range as aforementioned am I correct in assuming it is better to integrate the thermal expansion formula rather than taking an average value for the thermal expansion coefficient?

Second question: When integrating the thermal expansion formula am I correct in assuming (as is usually the case) that I should use temperatures in Kelvin?
Please specify the exact forms of the thermal expansion equations that you are talking about here.
 
I'm only concerned with length so its the linear equation of thermal expansion: (ΔL/L0)=α(T)ΔT
 
Eric MIlburn said:
I'm only concerned with length so its the linear equation of thermal expansion: (ΔL/L0)=α(T)ΔT
Eric, in this equation, alpha depends on both T and T0, and the equation is valid only for small values of ΔT. If you want to write the equation correctly, and you want it to apply over a large range of temperatures, you have to write $$\frac{1}{L}\frac{dL}{dT}=\alpha(T)$$and integrate this differential equation with respect to T. Otherwise, you will get the wrong answer.
 
Ok perfect that answers my first question, thanks! And you would use temperatures in Kelvin after integrating correct?
 
Eric MIlburn said:
Ok perfect that answers my first question, thanks! And you would use temperatures in Kelvin after integrating correct?
I would use degrees C. There is no need to convert to Kelvin in this calculation.
 
  • #10
What if α(T) takes the form of a third order polynomial for instance? Wouldn't units have an effect then?
For instance (3254-2754)≠(524-24)
 
  • #11
Eric MIlburn said:
What if α(T) takes the form of a third order polynomial for instance? Wouldn't units have an effect then?
For instance (3254-2754)≠(524-24)
The relationship for alpha has to specify whether the temperature in the equation is expressed in C or whether it is expressed in K.
 
  • #12
Makes total sense, so since in my case since I plotted α vs. T in Kelvin to get an equation for α(T) the units for the integrated equation would also be Kelvin. But had I plotted α vs. T in celsius I would then use celsius in the integrated equation as well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
  • #13
Worth noting that if the top temperature puts the metal in the plastic range then contraction on cooling is partly dependent on the cooling procedure .
 
  • #14
Nidum said:
Worth noting that if the top temperature puts the metal in the plastic range then contraction on cooling is partly dependent on the cooling procedure .
Interesting, could you elaborate? I wasn't aware different cooling mechanisms could affect how much a material contracts. If you could give a few examples I'd be interested to hear.
 
  • #15
Nidum said:
Worth noting that if the top temperature puts the metal in the plastic range then contraction on cooling is partly dependent on the cooling procedure .
Is this true, even though the expansion occurs at negligible stress (and isotropically)?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Thank you for your interest . I am preparing a note on this subject .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K