Thermal Properties - Specific heat.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a calorimetry problem involving a calorimeter containing water and ice, with steam being introduced to raise the temperature to 30°C. The specific heat capacities for copper, water, and ice, as well as the latent heats for fusion and vaporization, are provided for calculations. The user attempts to apply the heat transfer equations Q=mcΔθ and Q=ml but struggles with the calculations. The main focus is on determining the total heat required to raise the temperature of all components and identifying the source of that heat, which is the steam condensing. The conversation emphasizes the need to accurately account for all components' heat contributions to solve the problem.
FlyingSpartan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A well lagged calorimeter of mass 120g contains 200g of water and 50g of ice, initial at 0°C. A jet of steam is blown through the water until the water temperature reaches 30°C.

Calculate the mass of steam that must condensed.

The specific heat capacity of Copper: 380Jkg-1K-1
The specific heat capacity of Water: 4200Jkg-1K-1
The specific heat capacity of Ice: 2100Jkg-1K-1

The specific latent heat of fusion of Ice: 3.25x105 Jkg-1
The specific latent heat of vaporization of Water: 2.25x106Jkg-1


Homework Equations


Q=mcΔθ
Q=ml

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt was using Q=mcΔθ, for water (200x-3) x (4200) x (30) = 25200Jkg-1K-1

And similar for Ice

(50x10-3)x(2100)x(30)=3150Jkg-1K-1


However to me it doesn't look like I'm going anywhere.. any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Determine all the components that need to be warmed up. Calculate the total heat that needs to be added in order to bring all of those components to the final temperature.

Where's the heat going to come from?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top