Thermal radiation and charged particle acceleration

AI Thread Summary
A non-ionized neutral gas, like xenon, can emit thermal radiation primarily due to electron transitions, despite some sources attributing this to charged particle acceleration. The discussion highlights that significant quantities of xenon gas are necessary for notable infrared emissivity. Collisions between atoms may induce dipolar characteristics, potentially contributing to thermal radiation. For radio-wave emissions, hyperfine transitions are suggested as a necessary mechanism. Overall, the conversation seeks a plausible model for gas emissions without relying on electron orbital changes.
Getterdog
Messages
83
Reaction score
6
A non ionized neutral gas should still emit thermal radiation.,say xenon. Is this solely because of electron transitions ? I ask this because a lot of sources attribute the emission to charge particle acceleration,so neutral atoms should not do this,is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qualitatively, I think you could expect to require a tremendous quantity of Xenon gas before it had appreciable emissivity in the infrared. I can't supply any quantitative info, but I think your assessment is reasonably accurate. Perhaps in the process of a collision with other atoms, the atoms will be made somewhat dipolar. It would be interesting if anyone can supply some quantitative detail to the emissivity for thermal radiation in the non-ionized case.
 
I’m looking for a plausible model for a gas ,something that emits in the radio wave regime, As before all I could come up with for a warm mono atomic non ionized gas,was some sort or deformation of the electron cloud upon collision,with resultant relaxation. Some mechanism that doesn’t involve change of electron orbitals.just trying to see if this is accurate.
 
Getterdog said:
some sort or deformation of the electron cloud upon collision,with resultant relaxation
How don't see how this would lead to relaxation by emission of radiation.

If you want emission in the radio-wave part of the EM spectrum, you need to consider hyperfine transitions.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top