Thin film red light green light interference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum nonzero thickness of a soap film that causes destructive interference for green light (477 nm) while allowing red light (652 nm) to reflect. The key point is to use the wavelength of the green light in the formula for destructive interference, specifically considering the refractive index of the soap film (n = 1.333). Participants clarify that wavelengths should not be added together; instead, only the wavelength corresponding to the light being eliminated is relevant. The correct approach involves applying the interference condition for the selected wavelength. The emphasis is on accurately interpreting the problem to find the solution.
arod2812
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mixture of red light (wavelength vacuum = 652 nm) and green light (wavelength vacuum = 477 nm) shines perpendicularly on a soap film (n = 1.333) that has air on either side. What is the minimum nonzero thickness of the film, so that destructive interference removes the latter wavelength from the reflected light?

Homework Equations



HOW do I do this problem if this is a mixture of light? Do I simply add the wavelength value and if so at what point in the problem are they added??

The Attempt at a Solution


I used: sin(theta) = m (wavelength/n) and plugged in the value for n=1.333 and but I don't know what to plug in for wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't be adding any wavelengths, if that's what you're thinking. Read the problem more carefully:
arod2812 said:
What is the minimum nonzero thickness of the film, so that destructive interference removes the latter wavelength from the reflected light?
That's the wavelength you have to worry about.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top