Things that make no sense to you

  • Thread starter Thread starter some bloke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    News
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
364 replies · 33K views
Jarvis323 said:
Did anyone mention tip screens on ipads at places people previously didn't tip. People are now getting tips for taking your money. This didn't make sense until 2020.

Another one is commercials during trailers for movies; basically commercials during commercials. How long until the commercial commercials have commercials too?
From time to time I will search You Tube for a commercial and have to watch a commercial to see it.
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Ivan Seeking said:
From time to time I will search You Tube for a commercial and have to watch a commercial to see it.
Yes, but is it a commercial for a competing product? Now *that* would be smart advertising! :wink:
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, hutchphd, Ivan Seeking and 1 other person
BillTre said:
The lay fish designation is an older term than the fish as defined by biology.
Its seems to just refer to some animal living in the water. This meaning has been around for a long time.

Shellfish is another good example: molluscs and crustaceans (and maybe some other things).
Neither are anything like a fish (to biology), and they aren't even closely related to each other.
This has even come up in law. there are old treaties defining fishing rights. One case came up invoking a treaty of, if I remember, the 13th century. Some category or other was entitled to take fish from certain seas (this was in the Channel Islands if I remember) but they were taking lobsters etc. which was contested.It was ruled that lobsters were fish at the time of the treaty.
 
Reply
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary and BillTre
epenguin said:
This has even come up in law. there are old treaties defining fishing rights.
Moby Dick, the "Royal Fish."
 
What makes no sense?

William Shatner will go to space in about a week aboard Blue Origin. He has been to space many, many times. He should give someone else a chance.
 
Reply
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jtbell, Keith_McClary, DaveC426913 and 1 other person
Ivan Seeking said:
What makes no sense?

William Shatner will go to space in about a week aboard Blue Origin. He has been to space many, many times. He should give someone else a chance.

st tumblr_mubbrdAQdf1r60h6bo3_250.gif

st tumblr_mubbrdAQdf1r60h6bo4_250.gif
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and BillTre
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking, Keith_McClary and BillTre
Vanadium 50 said:
Camouflage? How about US Navy blue camouflage uniforms:

View attachment 289814
I think the point is that if they fall overboard, the enemy will not be able to find them. I'm not sure this has been thought through all the way.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking, Vanadium 50 and Twigg
Ivan Seeking said:
He just hopes nothing is outside and looking back.
Something on the wing??
 
DaveC426913 said:
Something on the wing??
OMG! I didn't even think of that!
 
1633577069531.png

JEEEEEEEFFFFFFFFF!
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Ivan Seeking
So I was reading about quantum tunneling, and then I noticed google started suggesting I search "isolated tetrahedra". Is there a particular reason for this connection? People who search for information about quantum tunneling also search for information about isolated tetrahedra?

isolated_tetrahedra.png
 
Jarvis323 said:
So I was reading about quantum tunneling, and then I noticed google started suggesting I search "isolated tetrahedra". Is there a particular reason for this connection? People who search for information about quantum tunneling also search for information about isolated tetrahedra?

View attachment 296111
No, it's suggesting searches that begin with the letters "is..."
 
DrGreg said:
No, it's suggesting searches that begin with the letters "is..."
I know that. The mystery is why it has personalized the list it generates for me to place "isolated tetrahedra" at the top.
 
Jarvis323 said:
I know that. The mystery is why it has personalized the list it generates for me to place "isolated tetrahedra" at the top.
You could retire tomorrow and buy a small Caribbean island if you can figure out google's suggestion algorithm. I think it's more secret than the nuclear launch codes, and certainly changes more often.

It also seems remarkably stupid sometimes.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jarvis323
DaveE said:
You could retire tomorrow and buy a small Caribbean island if you can figure out google's suggestion algorithm. I think it's more secret than the nuclear launch codes, and certainly changes more often.

It also seems remarkably stupid sometimes.
The default suggestions I get for a-z at least don't seem too mysterious.

1643314302058.png

Maybe one day google's search suggestion algorithm will discover a theory of everything, and then we'll slowly figure it out over time as it unknowingly steers us in the right direction.

Or maybe if it discovers a theory of everything, it will just internally try to leverage it somehow to maximize advertising revenue.
 
Reply
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and hutchphd
@Jarvis323
...I was reading about quantum tunneling, and then I noticed google started suggesting I search "isolated tetrahedra".

If the suggestions and/or search results seem out-of-wack, remove the Google cookies from the browser.

My searches vary from 'everyday mundane' to rather technical. When the technical searches start returning grade school stuff, I clear the Google cookie crumbs and all of a sudden Google Scholar results start showing up.

Try it; you'll like it! :))

Cheers,
Tom
 
Reply
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jarvis323, Klystron, Keith_McClary and 1 other person
Since I'm using Windows, the browsers have cookie removal capability built-in. On the toolbar (usually at the top) it typically appears under:
Tools
Preferences
Privacy
Show Cookies

You can also completely disable cookies (with an exception list if desired), or delete at end-of-session. (Often the deletion really occurs at the next browser start-up rather than upon closing)
 
Tom.G said:
Since I'm using Windows, the browsers have cookie removal capability built-in. On the toolbar (usually at the top) it typically appears under:
Tools
Preferences
Privacy
Show Cookies

You can also completely disable cookies (with an exception list if desired), or delete at end-of-session. (Often the deletion really occurs at the next browser start-up rather than upon closing)
The bookmarklet is one click to remove the cookies for the site you're on. Now that many sites are popping up a cookies dialog bar at the footer, that says accept all cookies or manage cookie preferences, I usually hit accept all and then remove cookies.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jarvis323
You can also use search engines like DuckDuckGo that don't track your previous searches. Google tries to match result to your previous searches.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jarvis323, Klystron and sysprog
WWGD said:
You can also use search engines like DuckDuckGo that don't track your previous searches. Google tries to match result to your previous searches.
Also run cleaning programs, free or 'professional' versions, at OS and browser startup a/o shutdown that eliminate cookies and other internet residue, as you prefer.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jarvis323 and WWGD
Klystron said:
Also run cleaning programs, free or 'professional' versions, at OS and browser startup a/o shutdown that eliminate cookies and other internet residue, as you prefer.
If I may say so, Google's strategy of returning results that match previous searches has helped promote radicalization in that ittends to keep people in their own bubbles by returning results/data within the range of one's experience, and not allowing new ones.
 
WWGD said:
If I may say so, Google's strategy of returning results that match previous searches has helped promote radicalization in that ittends to keep people in their own bubbles by returning results/data within the range of one's experience, and not allowing new ones.
They now have algorithms to downrank sites that disagree with the mainstream media.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
MikeeMiracle said:
Is this post just about technology or can we post stuff about people to? The thing I fail to understand is people who spends countless thousands of pounds to go on holiday to a hot country, stay in a hotel a hundred yards from the beach...and then go swimming in the hotel pool instead of the Sea!

It make zero sense to me, you could have swam in a pool in your own town...
Well where I come from it is logical. For 6 Month of the year you have Box Jellyfish, all year round you get your Sharks, and now Saltwater Crocodiles are speculating on Tourists for lunch or dinner.
 
WWGD said:
Google tries to match result to your previous searches.
Dear Google,
If my previous search results yielded what I wanted I wouldn't be searching AGAIN! :headbang:
 
WWGD said:
Google tries to match result to your previous searches.

Lol. . . there's no question about it. . . . :wink:

1643449641506.png


.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Lupo said:
Well where I come from it is logical. For 6 Month of the year you have Box Jellyfish, all year round you get your Sharks, and now Saltwater Crocodiles are speculating on Tourists for lunch or dinner.
Yes, one can add riptides, sharp rocks, 'rogue' waves, cold water, strong currents, kelp tangles, live and dead jellyfish, oil and sewer spills, stoned surfers and boogey boarders, and sociopathic yachtsmen firing guns near shore to the dangers of open ocean swimming. Growing up close to famous beaches in Northern California, I loved ocean swimming while always maintaining a sharp eye for hazards.

Saltwater improves buoyancy and allows chlorination via electrolysis. A heated properly maintained saltwater swimming pool provides the best of both environments IMO.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
People who say/use "diffuse" when they mean "defuse;" the words are NOT equivalent.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970