Thinking time vs. Writing Time

What is the maximum ratio for you?

  • 1-2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 3-4

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • 5-6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7-8

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 9-10

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 11-15

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • 16-20

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It doesn't matter. I must write it out.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
andytoh
Messages
357
Reaction score
3
This may seem a very strange poll but I honestly want to know what others think. I just spent 1 hour writing out a full, rigourous solution to a problem. I formulated the main idea in about 5 minutes and I knew that my proof (once written out) would be correct. After spending about 12 times longer to write it out than "proving it in my mind" I wonder whether it was worth it (the question is not part of an assignment).

On the one hand, I picked up details that was not in my mind at first, and my fully written solution is forever saved and I can look it up if I ever want to try the problem again. I also exercised my mathematical rigour and proof-writing in general. Besides, by writing it out I could have realized that the solution in my mind was wrong. On the other hand, I spent 12 times longer than solving it in my mind and I could have done many other questions in that time.

So my poll question is: What is the greatest writing-time-to-thinking-time ratio that you would accept to write out the full solution to a problem? When I say thinking time, I mean solving the question in your mind (or scribbling the key ideas) to the point where you know you are correct (up to minor details that you know can be filled if you choose to write out the full solution). For example, if your ratio is 1:6, it means that if you can solve a problem in your mind in, say, 5 minutes, but it will take you 30 minutes to write it out fully (and the question is not an assignment question), you would just forego writing out the solution (or just scribble out the key ideas) and move on. Sorry I could not phrase the question more informally.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Or perhaps if your question is not an assigment question, just jot down the key steps and then move on to your next question? This sure saves a lot of time and thus allows you to do more questions, but some of your "sketched solutions" may actually turn out to be wrong (and you will erroneously continue to believe that your sketched solution is correct).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top