This answer has been edited to fix the grammar and punctuation errors.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I am supposed to show equation 6.6 on page 97 of http://www.phys.lsu.edu/~jarrell/CO...hysics Henrik Bruus and Karsten Flensberg.pdf
I have tried to plug A and the expression for ln(t)> into 6.3 a) on page 96 but end up with a double integral after doing the linear approximation of the time evolution operator. Is my method correct and if so, how do I conjugate transpose the expression for U when given by the first order integral? Second of all I am quite confused by the notation <A>_0. Does that simply mean <A(t0)> or am I missing something?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have attached my attempt.
 

Attachments

  • attempt.png
    attempt.png
    15.3 KB · Views: 1,011
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:

I have tried to plug A and the expression for ln(t)> into 6.3 a) on page 96 but end up with a double integral after doing the linear approximation of the time evolution operator. Is my method correct


Yes, you have the correct approach. But I think you should be careful with the notation and use a carat ^ to denote any operator or state in the interaction picture (as introduced in section 5.3 of the notes.) Also, there is no operator ##\hat{H}''## with a double prime.

You only want to keep terms up to first order in ##\hat{H}'##. So, you should not get a double integral. You will have two single integrals that you can combine into one single integral.

how do I conjugate transpose the expression for U when given by the first order integral?

It should be easy to take the Hermitian conjugate of ##\hat{U}## since ##\hat{H}'(t)## is a Hermitian operator.

Second of all I am quite confused by the notation <A>_0. Does that simply mean <A(t0)> or am I missing something?

See just below equation (6.6). The notation ##\langle \rangle_0## means an equilibrium average with respect to the Hamiltonian ##H_0##. Thus ##\langle A \rangle_0## means exactly the expression defined by equation (6.1a). Note that ##\langle A \rangle_0## is time independent, so you don't need to worry about the time for this quantity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top