I This gas work violates 2nd law of thermodynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aliinuur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Work
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the thermodynamic implications of using a piston to transfer energy between two gases. It asserts that the process does not violate the second law of thermodynamics, as heat transfer requires a temperature difference, and the pistons' interaction primarily involves mechanical work rather than direct heat transfer. Participants debate the nature of the pistons' movement, whether it is elastic or inelastic, and how this affects energy distribution and entropy changes. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise definitions and calculations to clarify the thermodynamic processes involved. Ultimately, the complexities of the system demonstrate that all thermodynamic laws remain intact.
  • #61
Philip Koeck said:
I've tried to simplify the problem, hopefully retaining its essence, and do an analysis, but I ran into some difficulties. Maybe someone can tell me how to proceed.

If I have a closed cylinder as in the sketch but only 1 piston between gas A and gas B, so no vacuum, then I don't need to think about collisions between pistons.
Initially I have the following situation:
Gas A occupies 1/3 of the cylinder on the left, gas B occupies 2/3 on the right and they are separated by a piston. The number of moles (n) is the same for both and remains constant.

For the starting values of volume, pressure and temperature we have:
VB = 2 VA
PA = 2 PB
TA = TB = T

There is no heat transfer between a gas and anything else (piston, cylinder or the other gas).
The piston is extremely heavy so that expansion and compression will be quasi-static.

If I release the piston gas A will expand very slowly and gas B will be compressed. The sum of volumes is constant.

This process should stop when the pressures of gas A and B are the same.
Gas A will have cooled off and gas B will have heated up.

Here's my problem:
If I treat the expansion of A and the compression of B as reversible adiabatic, then the whole process will be reversible since nothing happens in the surroundings.
(I checked that analytically, just to be sure, and if I use expressions for reversible adiabatic processes ( P Vγ = constant, for example), I get ΔS = 0 for both gases (with some rounding errors).

However, by just looking at it, I would swear the process must be irreversible.

How would you calculate the final temperatures and volumes of the gases and the entropy-changes?
There are some irreversible path problems (most) that can't be solved without solving the PDE's for continuity, Navier Stokes, and differential thermal energy balance internal to the system for the spatial variations of temperature, pressure, and velocity. This is one such problem.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck
Science news on Phys.org
  • #62
Chestermiller said:
There are some irreversible path problems (most) that can't be solved without solving the PDE's for continuity, Navier Stokes, and differential thermal energy balance internal to the system for the spatial variations of temperature, pressure, and velocity. This is one such problem.
Chestermiller said:
There are some irreversible path problems (most) that can't be solved without solving the PDE's for continuity, Navier Stokes, and differential thermal energy balance internal to the system for the spatial variations of temperature, pressure, and velocity. This is one such problem.
I think gas A and gas B volumes oscillate between 1/3V and 2/3V, so yeah, this is reversible process.
 
  • #63
This is incorrect. Gas viscosity damps the motion so that, in the final state, the pistons are no longer moving.
 
  • #64
aliinuur said:
TL;DR Summary: Gas by doing negative work(losing heat), say accelerating a piston violates 2nd law of thermo, because kinetic energy of piston can be used to make other gas hotter, thus in summary one gas gets colder, other one gets hotter and this by simple piston!!!!
There is no transfer of heat in this scenario. There is work being done, and temperatures are changing, but neither of those things need be associated with a transfer of heat.

Heat is a transfer of energy due to a temperature difference. Just because there's a temperature change you can't assume there's heat energy being transferred. There could instead be (and indeed there is) work done. That is the essence of the 1st Law of Thermo.
 
  • Like
Likes aliinuur and Philip Koeck
  • #65
Chestermiller said:
This is incorrect. Gas viscosity damps the motion so that, in the final state, the pistons are no longer moving.
I assume even an ideal gas would have a certain viscosity due to random collisions between molecules.
Do you agree?
 
  • #66
Philip Koeck said:
I assume even an ideal gas would have a certain viscosity due to random collisions between molecules.
Do you agree?
Definitely. See chapter 1, Transport Phenomena by Bird el al.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
135
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
393
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
30
Views
3K