# Thomas Calc 11th ed., Problem 5.63

1. Aug 20, 2012

### noclueatol

I'm just working through this book for self-study, so I hope this isn't a stupid question.

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

What values of a and b maximize the value of $\int_{a}^{b}(x-x^{2}){dx}$?

2. Relevant equations

(Hint: Where is the integrand positive?)

3. The attempt at a solution

Well, the integrand is positive for 0 < x < 1, and the answer in the back of the book is a=0, b=1. That gives a value of (1/2 - 1/3) = 1/6.

But the problem asks about the expression as a whole, not the integrand. And it doesn't specify that a<b. For large values of x, the integrand will take on a large negative value. Then if you reverse the order of the limits, you get a large positive value. So why wouldn't, say, a=10,000 and b=1 yield a much larger value for the integral than the given answer? Or is it always assumed that a<b?

Last edited: Aug 20, 2012
2. Aug 20, 2012

### Staff: Mentor

I believe that they're tacitly assuming that a and b in the limits of integration are in the order a < b.

3. Aug 20, 2012

### Bacle2

Right, but a Riemann sum will have negative terms when the integrand is negative.

4. Aug 20, 2012

### noclueatol

So are you saying that I'm correct that I could get a larger value for the integral with b>a, but that would be violating the tacit assumption?

5. Aug 20, 2012

### noclueatol

Yes, but won't reversing the limits make the integral positive?

6. Aug 20, 2012

### Staff: Mentor

Definite integrals are usually written with the lower integration limit being less than the upper limit, and I think it's reasonable to assume that that's what Thomas had in mind for this problem.

The value of the integral will be largest on the largest interval for which the integrand is greater than or equal to zero: namely, the interval [0, 1].

Don't overthink this.

7. Aug 20, 2012

### noclueatol

I wouldn't if it was a drill problem, but as the high number indicates, it's in the "theory" part of the exercises, which sort of encourages second thoughts. Also, the concept of reversing the limits to change the sign of the integral was introduced in this same section, so I would have thought they expected me to use it in solving the problems.

Oh well, if all I'm missing is a tacit assumption, then I guess I'm satisfied that I understood the material. Thanks for the responses.

8. Aug 21, 2012

### Bacle2

If you reverse the limits of integration,you will basically be seeking to

maximize ∫ (x2-x)dx, instead of ∫ x-x2dx .

This seems a different problem, tho maybe I misunderstood

your goal. Still, the idea would be the same, in that the intervals that maximize

your integral are those where x2-x >0 .