Thorium Doubling Time in Fast Reactors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed Shaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the utilization of Thorium in fast reactors, particularly the long breeding doubling times ranging from 20 to 80 years. Key factors influencing this include the absorption cross-section of neutrons, which varies significantly with energy levels. Lower absorption cross-sections result in longer times for fertile nuclei to absorb neutrons and undergo decay. Thermal and epithermal systems exhibit much higher absorption rates in specific energy ranges compared to MeV ranges. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of Thorium's role in nuclear fuel cycles and provides resources for further exploration.
Ahmed Shaker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have done some reading on the utilization of Thorium in fast reactors, but the doubling time for breeding ranges from 20 to 80 years, is there any solid material on the subject? Just curious.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do you have a specific question?
 
Ahmed Shaker said:
I have done some reading on the utilization of Thorium in fast reactors, but the doubling time for breeding ranges from 20 to 80 years, is there any solid material on the subject? Just curious.
It's a matter of the magnitude of absorption cross-section as a function of energy. The lower the absorption cross-section, the longer is takes for a given mass/number of fertile nuclei to absorb neutrons, which then initiates the decay process to something hopefully more fissionable. Thermal and epithermal systems have a population of neutrons in the resonance absorption range (1 eV to 3 keV) where the absorption cross-sections can be two or three orders of magnitude greater than those in the MeV range. The thermal energy range below 1 eV has an increasing magnitude as neutron energy decreases.

See - the (n,γ) cross-sections here - http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sigma/index.jsp?as=232&lib=endfb7.1&nsub=10

http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/7192/Thorium-Fuel-Cycle-Potential-Benefits-and-Challenges
 
  • Like
Likes mheslep
QuantumPion said:
Do you have a specific question?
Not really, just wanted some broad information. But I have all that I need now.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top