Thought Experiment on Charge Carriers and Electrical Conduction

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a hypothetical system called a “miracle pipe” that contains two types of charge carriers: electrons and a proposed particle called “electrop.” The participants explore questions related to electrical conduction, the nature of current flow, and the behavior of this system compared to conventional conductors, plasmas, and other materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the “electrop” would interact with electrons, suggesting that if they formed stable pairs, it could negate the presence of charge carriers.
  • Others argue that the system resembles a plasma, noting that plasmas can conduct current and that the two charge flows can be interpreted in multiple valid ways.
  • There is a suggestion that the system would behave most like a plasma, with resistance determined by particle interactions and collisions, referencing Spitzer resistivity.
  • One participant provides an example of a discharge tube where positive and negative charges flow in opposite directions, indicating that similar principles may apply to the hypothetical system.
  • Concerns are raised about whether a fixed positive background is necessary for conduction, with references to existing technologies like vacuum tubes that operate without such a background.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the hypothetical system, with some asserting it behaves like a plasma while others question the implications of charge neutrality and the necessity of a fixed positive background. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the fundamental requirements for electrical conduction in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the behavior of the “electrop” and its interactions with electrons, as well as the implications of charge neutrality in the absence of a fixed positive background. The discussion also touches on the complexities of defining resistance in a system without a lattice structure.

Pawan Kumar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thought Experiment on Charge Carriers and Electrical Conduction

Consider a hypothetical system involving a “miracle pipe” that contains no atoms, no nuclei, and no conventional matter. Inside this pipe exist two types of particles:

1. Electrons — identical to real electrons in mass, mobility, and behavior, carrying negative charge.


2. A hypothetical particle called “electrop” — identical to an electron in every physical aspect (mass, size, response to electric and magnetic fields, mobility, quantum behavior, etc.) except that it carries a positive electric charge of the same magnitude as the electron.

Assume:

  • The pipe is electrically neutral overall (equal number of electrons and electrops).
  • There is no lattice of positive ions, no protons, and no atomic structure.
  • Both particles are free to move along the length of the pipe.
  • An external electric field is applied along the pipe.

Questions:

1. Can a stable electric current exist in such a system?
2. If current flows, how should it be physically interpreted — as two opposite charge flows or as a single net current?
3. Would this system behave more like a metal, a plasma, or an electrolyte in terms of electrical conduction?
4. What would determine the resistance of such a system in the absence of a lattice (e.g., particle–particle interactions, collisions, collective effects)?
5. Are there known physical analogues to this system (e.g., electron–hole conduction in semiconductors or plasma conduction)?
6. Would magnetic fields generated by the current behave differently compared to conventional conductors?

I am particularly interested in whether charge neutrality combined with mobile opposite charge carriers alone is sufficient for electrical conduction, or whether a fixed positive background (such as atomic nuclei in metals) is fundamentally required.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your hypothetical “electrop”differs from the positron (the electron’s anti-particle, and not hypothetical) only in that it doesn’t interact with electrons? They would form bound pairs with electrons (like positronium, but stable), these pairs would be neutral, and now we don’t have charge carriers or current.
Pawan Kumar said:
I am particularly interested in whether charge neutrality combined with mobile opposite charge carriers alone is sufficient for electrical conduction, or whether a fixed positive background (such as atomic nuclei in metals) is fundamentally required.
Consider an old fashioned vacuum tube or CRT display. Current flows without any fixed background.
 
What you describe is just an odd plasma. It is odd because it is completely ionized and because the two charge carriers are approximately equal mass. But it is a plasma and would behave like a plasma and can be understood in that fashion.

Pawan Kumar said:
1. Can a stable electric current exist in such a system?
Yes. Plasmas can and do conduct current.

Pawan Kumar said:
2. If current flows, how should it be physically interpreted — as two opposite charge flows or as a single net current?
Either way is equally valid. Maxwell’s equations are linear.

Pawan Kumar said:
3. Would this system behave more like a metal, a plasma, or an electrolyte in terms of electrical conduction?
It is a plasma so it would behave most like a plasma.

Pawan Kumar said:
4. What would determine the resistance of such a system in the absence of a lattice (e.g., particle–particle interactions, collisions, collective effects)?
The resistivity of a plasma is commonly approximated by the Spitzer resistivity. This is based on collisions between the ions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spitzer_resistivity

Pawan Kumar said:
5. Are there known physical analogues to this system (e.g., electron–hole conduction in semiconductors or plasma conduction)?
It is a plasma.

Pawan Kumar said:
6. Would magnetic fields generated by the current behave differently compared to conventional conductors?
No. The only difference is that the plasma itself responds strongly to its magnetic fields. Everything becomes highly coupled.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE
An example of a device where positive and negative charges flow in opposite directions is the demountable discharge tube made by Teltron, https://www.healthandcare.co.uk/student-tubes/teltron-discharge-tube-s.html. This has a screen at each end, one showing the negative beam and the other the positive. The tube contains a plasma. The initial conduction occurs because electrons are pulled out of the gas atoms, but as the voltage is raised, collisions become more frequent, releasing more charge carriers, and a rapid increase in conduction occurs.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K