Programs Thoughts on Caltechs Applied Physics Graduate Program

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the applied physics program and materials science, with inquiries about the differences from the pure physics PhD program. The applied physics program includes a range of required courses, although students with a strong background may be exempt. The participant shares their experience of being admitted to the applied physics program after initially applying to the pure physics program, suggesting that their focus on practical applications in their statement of purpose influenced this decision. There is a desire for insights from those familiar with the applied physics program to better understand its structure and expectations.
vancouver_water
Messages
76
Reaction score
10
Why is it paired with materials science? I have not been able to find too much about it online apart from their own stuff. How different is it from their pure physics PhD program? It seems that they have a lot of required courses, although you do not need to take them if you have a sufficiently strong background.

I was admitted to their graduate program and am looking to talk to people who have some experience with this specific program.

The website: http://aph.caltech.edu/academics/grad/aph

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you clarify your scenario? Did you apply for the program without knowing what it's about? (If so, why?) Or did you apply for the regular physics program, were not offered admission there, but instead were offered admission to the applied physics program?
 
I applied to the pure physics program (never heard of the applied physics program until I got an email saying I was accepted to it). My statement of purpose was focused on applications of physics to nanophotonics and quantum information so I guess I can see why they recommended me for applied physics rather than physics.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
120
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top