Thoughts on magnetic fields and life on planets.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of magnetic fields on life forms, particularly in relation to Jupiter's magnetic field and the concept of multipolar planets. It highlights the potential challenges that radiation from solar wind poses to life, while acknowledging the existence of extremophiles on Earth that thrive in radiation-protected environments, such as mid-ocean vents. The conversation raises questions about how life, particularly non-carbon-based forms, might adapt to different magnetic field configurations, specifically in planets with multiple magnetic poles. However, there is skepticism regarding the stability of multipolar magnetic fields, as they are believed to be transient and not conducive to long-term planetary conditions. The need for verifiable scientific research on this topic is emphasized, with references to existing literature that suggests solar wind can still be deflected during pole flips, indicating that the effects of multipolarity on life remain largely speculative.
unusually_wrong
Messages
37
Reaction score
7
After reading about Jupiter's magnetic field on ScienceAlert, I remembered another article about tree bark and magnetic anomalies (links below). I also remembered an article on birds being able to see magnetic fields as well. It got me thinking of how and if life is possible on anything other than a dipolar planet.What are your thoughts on this and my apologies if this is posted in a wrong section.
https://www.sciencealert.com/jupiter-magnetic-field-asymmetrical-great-blue-spot-juno-strange-dynamo

https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/691/cv/kletetschka/Trunks.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is true that radiation from the solar wind would be harmful to life as we know it. But non-carbon based life forms have been discussed many times on past PF threads. Lacking details, its hard to say how sensitive they might be to radiation.

It is also true that we have life on Earth at the mid-ocean vents so deep in water as to be unaffected by radiation at the surface.

So it comes down to the perpetually elusive problem, Provide an all-inclusive definition of life.
 
I mean more of a planet with multiple magnetic poles. I wonder how anything from single cell to just plant life would be affected (not by the radiation, but the magnetic fields themselves).
 
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1546763 from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal

NASA_54559main_comparison1_strip.gif


That implies that Earth had multiple pole pairs at least transiently during pole reversal events. Since we are here, that is evidence that it did not wipe out life on Earth. But it does not prove that it did not have some effect.
 

Attachments

  • NASA_54559main_comparison1_strip.gif
    NASA_54559main_comparison1_strip.gif
    59.2 KB · Views: 452
  • Like
Likes unusually_wrong
Sure, but we're mostly a dipolar planet. I speak of planets that are multipolar.
 
I cannot find anything on the topic. Since you insist on multipolar planets and worded your title the way you did, which says 'let us speculate', I'm moving the thread to GD. It is not science-based. We want verifiable research from journals and standard textbooks.
 
The only article (not published) is noted here: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4985-solar-wind-to-shield-earth-during-pole-flip/
This means the paper had problems, since it did not make it into publication. As far as I can tell.

The pop science article says that during pole flip ( when there are multiple poles), Most of the solar wind is still deflected.

So we do not have any real reason to consider multipole planets this way, it appears. Plus, no good publications really being the primary reason.
 
Multiple magnetic poles while possible is an unstable condition that can't last very long.
I tried it with fridge magnets and always they collapse to something stable.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top