Is it worth transferring from UC Davis to UCLA for a career in physics research?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dilemma of transferring from UC Davis to UCLA for a physics major. The individual values their established connections and research opportunities at UC Davis, particularly in high-energy physics (HEP), and is concerned about the potential challenges of building new relationships and gaining research experience at UCLA in a limited timeframe. Participants emphasize the importance of existing research relationships and strong recommendations for graduate school applications, suggesting that the benefits of staying at UC Davis may outweigh the uncertainties associated with transferring. They question the motivations for the transfer, particularly whether it is driven by perceived prestige or specific academic opportunities at UCLA. Overall, the consensus leans towards valuing current academic and research stability over the risks of transferring.
gregarob
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am hoping that the infinite wisdom of Physics Forums can help me with a bit of an issue I have. Although I really do enjoy UC Davis, I applied for transfer this year and was admitted by UCLA. It is a tough choice for me because I am already well-rooted in the physics department at UCD and really enjoy the college-town atmosphere. On the other hand, I want to make sure that my decision is best for a career in physics research.

One important consideration for me is that I am already doing HEP research with one of my favorite professors, and it may take a while for me to gain the same traction with a different department. Also of concern is whether a year and a half (if that) will be enough time for professors to get to know me well enough to write strong recommendations for graduate admission.

What are your thoughts? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you have a great situation at UCD. I wouldn't give up everything you have for the chance of a better opportunity.
Additionally, UCD is certainly not a school that it looks bad to have attended.
I would concentrate on your studies now so that you can choose where you want to go for grad school.
 
I'm not sure that I understand your motivation for transferring. Are there particular courses that you would have access to at UCLA that you would not be able to take where you are currently? Is there a particular research group or club that you have an interest in that isn't where you are now?

If your motivation is only to improve your score on a graduate school application, I would hesitate giving up what you already have (a school/program that you seem to like and a research project with a professor you like), since you may not be able to get those very easily in a new school and they likely will count for much more than a school name and a somewhat arbitrary ranking.
 
Dont do it. For graduate admissions youre going to be judge on how good a physics student you are relative to your graduating class and the PGRE. It sounds like your doing really well relative to your class and this is offering benefits like research opportunities. Why would you trade that for an unknown standing relative to UCLA class and unknown amount of research opportunities
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top