Three Disks Coupled by Two Belts

  • Thread starter Thread starter efitzgerald21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupled
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of angular momentum between two disks, C and B, coupled by belts. The key equations include the angular momentum formula L = mvr and the moment of inertia for a disk, I = (mr^2)/2. The relationship between the disks' angular speeds is crucial, as they are interconnected, suggesting that their angular velocities may be proportional. The density of disks B and C is the same, which will aid in determining their masses for the calculations. Understanding these relationships is essential for solving the problem effectively.
efitzgerald21
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure below shows three rotating, uniform disks that are coupled by belts. One belt runs around the rims of disks A and C. Another belt runs around a central hub on disk A and the rim of disk B. The belts move smoothly without slippage on the rims and hub. Disk A has radius R; its hub has radius 0.6000R; disk B has radius 0.2000R; and disk C has radius 1.500R. Disks B and C have the same density (mass per unit volume) and thickness. What is the ratio of the magnitude of the angular momentum of disk C to that of disk B?
L(C)/L(B)=?
Image: http://www.webassign.net/hrw/W0249-N.jpg

Homework Equations


L=mvr=Iw (w is angular speed)
I(disk)=(mr^2)/2


The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly I have no clue how to even start this...
I think that the density will somehow give me mass to plug into equation for I, which can then be plugged into L. But I don't know how to get w or v and without those I don't know how to get L.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could the w's for each disk all be directly proportional to one another?

I think you are right about the density.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top