Three particles, finding Q of one of them (Coulomb's Law)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving three charged particles and applying Coulomb's Law to find the unknown charge Q. The user attempted to set the forces equal based on the equilibrium condition of the third particle but expressed uncertainty about their approach and calculations. A response highlighted the need for a clear strategy before manipulating formulas, suggesting that the user should define their method first. The importance of understanding the relationships between the charges and their positions in the context of equilibrium was emphasized. The conversation underscores the necessity of a structured approach to solving physics problems involving electrostatics.
syladelaney
Messages
1
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


"A particle with charge -3.03 nC is at the origin, and a particle with negative charge of magnitude Q is at x = 49.0 cm. A third particle with a positive charge is in equilibrium at x = 20.8 cm. What is Q?"

Homework Equations


I'm fairly certain that Coulomb's Law is the basis of this problem. I'm not entirely sure what all to put in this section, so I'm posting a few derivations of it.

E = F/q
F = k*(qQ/r^2)
E = k*Q/r^2
k = 8.99*10^9

The Attempt at a Solution


k*(-3.03nC)q/(.208m)^2 = k*Q*q/(.490)^2
^here I basically plugged values for the second equation above and set the forces equal to each other.
rearranging the equation and cancelling variables I got...
Q = (-3.03nC)*(.490/.208)^2
And solved to get Q = -16.8, which is evidently not correct.

I'm not sure if I manipulated the formulas wrong, made a mathematical error, or am approaching this with a fundamental misunderstanding. Also, I apologize if my formatting was hard to read. I'm new to the forums.
Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello syladelaney, :welcome:

syladelaney said:
k*Q*q/(.490)^2
What force is this ?
 
  • Like
Likes syladelaney
syladelaney said:
which is evidently not correct
Why is that so evident ?
 
  • Like
Likes syladelaney
Your fundamental misunderstanding is that you started "manipulating" formulas and set things equal to each other without a strategy. You put the cart before the horse. First state your strategy and then implement it by manipulating formulas and setting things to each other. So what is your strategy here?
 
  • Like
Likes syladelaney and BvU
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top