Tidal forces,moons & changing orbit in solar system.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of tidal forces on moons and their orbits within the solar system. It explains that while our moon is gradually moving away from Earth due to tidal interactions, a moon in retrograde orbit, like Triton around Neptune, would experience the opposite effect, being pulled closer to its planet. Mars' moon Phobos is highlighted as an example of a moon that is also moving closer to Mars because it orbits faster than the planet's rotation. The conversation raises a hypothetical scenario about whether a retrograde moon could gain altitude after being pulled in, but concludes that such a moon would always decelerate under tidal influence, ultimately leading to its destruction. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the moon's perspective in understanding these tidal dynamics.
P.Bo
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Ok I know our moon is getting farther away due to gravity (tidal force indirect), basically giving it kinetic energy and exchanging that for orbital energy.

If the moon was in retrograde orbit, i.e. Triton around Neptune, it would work the opposite way and pull the moon closer to the planet.

However something I just found out, Mars' moon Phobos (not in retrograde) is being pulled closer to the planet because it orbits faster than Mars spins.

So my question is, assuming the moon doesn't pass any Roche radius and get disintegrated, could a moon in retrograde motion get pulled close enough to the planet, eventually orbit faster than the planet rotates (still in opposite direction) and actually gain altitude again? Kind of yo-yoing back and forth between being pulled in and pulled higher?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, as in retrograde orbit the moon would always be decelerating under the tidal influence. Imagine our moon's perspective. It sees the Earth as spinning and as the Earth transfers momentum to it, the moon sees the Earth spin slower and slower until the two become tidally locked.

Now imagine a moon in retrograde. It sees the planet as spinning, but as momentum is stolen from it, it falls and orbits even faster, making the planet appear to rotate faster and faster until eventually it is destroyed by tidal forces.
 
Ah ok, didn't even think about it from the Moon's perspective.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top