Time Assumption for Newton Meter Projectile Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypochondriac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the initial velocity of projectiles launched using a Newton meter with a spring mechanism. The user seeks to measure the time it takes for the projectile to travel the launch distance, noting that visual timing methods are unreliable due to the high speed of the projectile. Suggestions include using light gates to accurately measure the time of flight and calculating the spring constant (k) to derive velocity using established physics formulas. The conversation clarifies the terminology around the apparatus, emphasizing that a Newton meter measures force, while the spring launcher is the primary tool for the experiment. Accurate measurements and calculations are essential for reliable results in the investigation.
Hypochondriac
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
ok so perhaps not a calculation queery of sorts but a coursework question none the less.

in my investigation I'm using a Newton meter to fire projectiles and i need to know the initial velocity, to work it out i need the time it takes to travel up the runway as it were.
now I have the Newton meter infront of me and it isn't as simple as timing it because it is VERY fast.

so perhaps i should assume the time, (its relatively constant at different parts of the Newton meter because as you increase the distance it travels you also increase the average force on it)

so what should i assume it to be? 0.1s? 0.01s? although i can't tell the difference between 0.1s and 0.01s it changes my initial velocity value 10fold
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean you are using a spring and a Newton meter to fire projectiles? Perhaps a more descriptive account of your apparatus would be helpful.

Whatever you are doing, you should not estimate the time by any sort of visual cue or other human ability because we are really bad at that kind of thing.
 
sorry
the apparatus is a Newton meter which has a spring in it so when you put a weight on it the spring stretches to tell you the force being applied.
however i have a thing attatched to to the pointer which would tell you the force applied, this holds projectiles, i secure the Newton meter at an angle and pull it back 5N or so then let go, then the projectile is launched.

is there anthing that can measure it then?
 
I'm only familiar with the term "Newton meter" in the context of units. A Newton (N) is a unit of force, and a meter (m) is a unit of distance. Thus, the Nm is a unit of work, since work is force multiplied by the distance that an object is moved by the force.

As Mindscrape is asking, is the apparatus really a spring launcher? Why are you calling it a Newton meter? Is that just the whimsical name that was put on the spring launcher by some other student? If it is a spring launcher, and you know the spring constant k and the mass of your projectile, then you can calculate the projectile velocity in several different ways, and you can also calculate how long the spring is in contact with the mass as it is being launched.
 
its a Newton metER though not a Newton metRE, although spelling may be a UK thing.
yes a Newton metre Nm is an SI unit, but a Newton meter (or at least as far as I'm aware is a meter that measures force/weight, it is a spring basically yeah. and as force is applied by pulling the spring, a pointer points the the number of Newtons of force.

apologies for the language difference.

How can i calculate the k of the spring.
then what're these 'several different ways' to calculate the velocity.

I was going to get 2 light gates to measure the time an object took to go through the two.

any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
You can figure out the spring constant by measuring its length with a mass on the end, and its length when it is stretched by an additional masses. If Fsp = kx, then the sum of forces for the first part are kx_1 = m_1g, and the second part shows that kx_2 = (m_1+m_2)g, where x_1 and x_2 are amount stretched beyond the rest length. Then you can continue to add masses and record lengths to get the best calibration (average the spring constant, or a least a squares fit of gravitational force against displacement would be better if you know how).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top