Time constant for gas to reach equipartion equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
A gas like CO2 absorbs electromagnetic radiation at specific resonant frequencies, leading to a non-equilibrium state when energy is introduced at one of these frequencies. The gas will eventually return to equipartition equilibrium, which can be approximated by an exponential decay of excess energy at the absorbed frequency. The dynamics involve factors such as the lifetime of the excited state and the mean free path of photons, which influence the time constant for equilibration. This time constant is affected by the gas's temperature and pressure, impacting how quickly the system returns to equilibrium. For further reading, inexpensive books on gas dynamics or statistical mechanics are recommended.
Calvadosser
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
My understanding is that a gas, such as CO2 for example, that interacts with electromagnetic radiation, can only absorb energy at specific frequencies, corresponding to the resonant frequencies of its molecule - equivalently the quantized energy associated with each molecular vibrational/rotational mode.

I also understand that such as gas reaches equilibrium, with equal energy in each possible mode (including kinetic energy) of its molecules [law of equipartition].

My question: If a volume of the gas is subjected to an impulse of electromagnetic energy at just one of the frequencies, F1 say, at which it absorbs radiation, then presumably immediately after it will be in a non-equilibrium state, with an excess of molecules energized at that F1.

MY QUESTION: I'd like to understand the dynamics of the gas once again reaching equipartition equilibrium. Presumably, it is actually very complicated but perhaps it can be approximated by a simple exponential curve by which the excess of molecules that have been energized at frequency F1 diminish until equilibrium is finally reached. Presumably some of the newly excited molecules will re-radiate the absorbed energy at F1 before the gas has reached equilibrium.

- Is my description correct? (Or are there misconceptions in what I have said?)

- If so, what is the approximate time constant involved?

- Does the time constant depend greatly on the temperature or the pressure of the gas? If so, how?

- What proportion of the energy at F1 absorbed from the impulse is re-radiated prior to the gas reaching equilibrium?

Thank you,
Martin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just some rough ideas - first there is the lifetime of the excited state. Equilibrium has to be longer than that. Then, upon de-exictation, the photon emitted will have a certain "mean free path" or average distance it travels until absorption. The optical depth of the medium. The time for a photon to travel a mean free path will be on the order of the equilibration time, as long as the lifetime of the excited state is much smaller. The mean free path should be something on the order of \lambda\approx 1/n\sigma where n is the number density of unexcited CO2 atoms and \sigma is the cross sectional area for absorption. The equilibration time is something like \lambda/c. That ignores excitation and re-radiation.

Its the optical depth that is the number you are looking for, really. The distance a photon or its offspring go before being converted to heat.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the reply.

Could you recommend an book where I can read up on all this? [preferably inexpensive]

Martin
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top