Time-Dependent Classical Lagrangian with variation of time

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the incorporation of time variations in the classical Lagrangian framework, particularly in the context of the calculus of variations. Participants explore the implications of introducing an additional variation in time alongside the usual spatial variations in the Lagrangian formulation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on how to define the variation of the Lagrangian, δL, when both spatial and temporal variations are present.
  • Another participant questions whether the inquiry pertains to the specific paper or the broader fundamentals of the calculus of variations.
  • A participant expresses familiarity with deriving the Euler-Lagrange equations without time variation but struggles with the additional complexity introduced by the time variation.
  • There is mention of a specific derivation that leads to a result similar to an equation in the referenced paper, but with discrepancies in the signs associated with the velocity terms.
  • One participant suggests downloading an attachment for further insights, while another notes that the attachment does not address coordinate variations.
  • A later reply points to an external resource that purportedly resolves the issue, but it is unclear how it relates to the ongoing discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the treatment of time variations in the Lagrangian. There are competing views on the adequacy of available resources and the specific challenges posed by the problem.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in existing literature regarding coordinate variations and the specific treatment of time-dependent variations in classical mechanics.

586
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I was reading the following review:

http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2009-4&page=articlesu23.html

And I got stuck at the first equation; (10.1)

So how I understand this is that there are two variations,

[itex]\tilde{q}(t)=q(t)+\delta q(t) \hspace{1cm} \text{and} \hspace{1cm} \tilde{t}=t+\delta t[/itex]

Further we also have a `total variaton' for q at first order:
[itex]\tilde{q}(\tilde{t})=q(t)+\delta q(t)+\dot{q}(t)\delta t[/itex]

and its derivative,
[itex]\dot{\tilde{q}}(\tilde{t})=\dot{q}(t)+\delta\dot{q}(t)+\ddot{q}(t) \delta t[/itex]

So now how is [itex]\delta L(q,\dot{q},t)[/itex] defined?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your question about the paper, or about the fundamentals of the calculus of variations?

If the latter, see the attachment at https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=752726#2

It contains a leisurely introduction to the calculus of variations, followed by derivations of Lagrangians & Hamiltonians.
 
The question is about the fundamentals of calculus of variations. I know how to derive the usual Euler-Lagrange equations without the extra variation in t [itex]\tilde{t}=t+\delta t[/itex]. But I am having trouble incorporating this extra variation.

if i define:
[itex]\delta L = \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \delta q + \frac{\partial L}{\partial q} \frac{\partial q}{\partial t}\delta t + \frac{\partial L }{\partial \dot{q} } \delta \dot{q} +\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}} \frac{\partial \dot{q}}{\partial t}\delta t + \frac{\partial L}{\partial t} \delta t[/itex]

then it gets a similar result as (10.1) but everywhere there is [itex]\dot{q}[/itex] they have [itex]-\dot{q}[/itex].

Its driving me pretty crazy. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Then download the attachment ...
 
Unfortunately the attachment does not treat coordinate variations.
 
Then you will need to find a specialized textbook.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K