Time dependent perturbation theory applied to energy levels

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of second order time dependent perturbation theory (TDPT) to derive corrections to energy levels in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the relationship between TDPT and concepts such as the AC Stark shift, while seeking clarity on the derivation of specific equations presented in a referenced paper.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks resources on deriving energy level corrections using second order TDPT, noting that traditional QM textbooks focus on population changes rather than energy level shifts.
  • Another participant questions whether the situation is analogous to calculating the AC Stark shift, suggesting a potential connection.
  • A participant describes their approach of calculating spin populations over time using second order TDPT and then taking the expectation value over the Hamiltonian, indicating that a direct formula may exist but would be complex and lengthy.
  • Concerns are raised about the tedious nature of the calculations involved, particularly regarding the necessity of multiple integrals, which may vary in difficulty.
  • There is confusion expressed about whether the state resulting from second order perturbation theory can be considered an eigenstate of the new Hamiltonian, and whether diagonalizing the time-dependent Hamiltonian is necessary for accurate energy calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the existence of a direct formula for energy level corrections using second order TDPT, and there is uncertainty regarding the equivalence of different approaches to calculating energy expectations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexity of deriving formulas and the potential difficulty of integrals involved in the calculations, indicating that assumptions about the simplicity of the system may not hold in general cases.

BillKet
Messages
311
Reaction score
30
Hello! I am reading this paper and in deriving equations 6/7 and 11/12 they claim to use second oder time dependent perturbation theory (TDPT) in order to get the correction to the energy levels. Can someone point me towards some reading about that? In the QM textbooks I used, for TDPT they just calculate the change in population as a function of time, but I have never seen a formula for the change in energy levels. I am able to derive 6/7 and 11/12 by applying a unitary transformation to the hamiltonian and working from there, but is there a simple formula to get these equations directly (similar to the energy formula for time independent perturbation theory)? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
@Twigg do you have any idea what they are doing here?
 
I am wondering if this analogous to calculating the AC Stark shift.
 
DrClaude said:
I am wondering if this analogous to calculating the AC Stark shift.
From what they claim in the paper, that seems to be the case, but I still don't know how to derive this perturbation theory formula in general (for a 2x2 level system at least).
 
Sorry for the slow reply. I had started working it out, and I spilled tea on my papers o:)

I don't think there is a direct formula. The way I was working it out was getting the spin-up and spin-down populations as a function of time from 2nd order TDPT, then taking the expectation value over the Hamiltonian.

If you wrote down the expectation value and substituted in the TDPT formulae for the perturbative corrections to the wavefunction, you would end up with a direct formula but it would be lengthy to the point of uselessness.
 
Twigg said:
Sorry for the slow reply. I had started working it out, and I spilled tea on my papers o:)

I don't think there is a direct formula. The way I was working it out was getting the spin-up and spin-down populations as a function of time from 2nd order TDPT, then taking the expectation value over the Hamiltonian.

If you wrote down the expectation value and substituted in the TDPT formulae for the perturbative corrections to the wavefunction, you would end up with a direct formula but it would be lengthy to the point of uselessness.
That looks very tedious (unless I am doing something wrong), and it also requires doing several integrals (in this case they are easy but in general it can be very difficult, no?).

Also I am a bit confused about this. If I start in an eigenstate of the unperturbed Hamiltonian, say ##(1,0)##, after a time, t, to second order in PT I will be in a state ##c_a(t)(1,0)+c_b(t)(0,1)##. Now I would calculate the expectation value of the Hamiltonian in this state and get the energy. But is this state ##c_a(t)(1,0)+c_b(t)(0,1)## an eigenstate of the new Hamiltonian such that the expectation value can be interpreted as an energy? Shouldn't I diagonalize my time dependent Hamiltonian, get the eigenvectors, and then propagate them in time? Or are the 2 approaches equivalent?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 156 ·
6
Replies
156
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K