Time-dependent SE for 'discrete' time steps

  • Thread starter Thread starter DougD720
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discrete Time
DougD720
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I'm trying to solve the S.E. For a potential that's time dependent but the time variable is not continuous. Essentially the potential is a finite square well and it shifts over time but not continuously.

I.e. At time 0<t<t' it's a finite square well centered about some x'

At time t'<t<t" it's a finite square well centered about x"

And so on. All the t's and x's are known numbers. Also it's not exactly a finite square well, here's an example at some time:

0<t<t' => V(x) = {∞ ; x<0 , V0 ; 0<x<P or P'<x<P" , 0 ; otherwise}

Where P, P', P" and V0 are known constants.

I thought I might be able to solve each situation time-independently and then just multiply by the time in each well over the total time but I don't think I can do that. If someone could let me know how to go about tackling this problem I'd appreciate it! I've taken 2 semesters of QM but am a little rusty. Just having trouble figuring out the plan of attack here (it's not for HW just something I'm working on where I'm modeling a process as a particle in the types of potentials shown).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A picture's worth a thousand words... here's the scenario if there were only two sets of times, hence the potential function only changes once:
 

Attachments

  • photo (2).JPG
    photo (2).JPG
    29 KB · Views: 449
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top