Time Dilation: An Overview of an Experiment

Commando Spaz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello,
It is my understanding that in the case of two observers (A and B) passing each other at high speeds that due to time dilation observer A would be moving in slow motion with respect to observer B, whereas observer B would be moving in slow motion relative to observer A (i.e. each observer perceives the other to be moving in slow motion). If this is incorrect stop me here and explain how so.

It is also my understanding that the effect of time dilation has been observed in an experiment in which one atomic clock remained in a fixed position whilst another was flown around the world (I know I'm simplifying this but there's no need for unnecessary complication). From this experiment the effect of time dilation was observed in that the clock which had traveled the world read a time which was behind that of the clock which had remained stationary (relative to us).

However, the clock fixed to Earth had moved with respect to the clock on the plane. Thus, if the information in the first paragraph is correct then does it not stand to reason that when the the two clocks were compared that for the people who had been on the plane, the clock that had been fixed to Earth was the one which was behind? Would this mean that the people who had been on Earth (us) had one reality whereas the people who had been on the plane had another? each observing the clock which had moved relative to them to be behind?

Any help clarifying this will be appreciated, Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Commando Spaz said:
Any help clarifying this will be appreciated, Thanks

This is the classic twin paradox. There's a pretty decent explanation at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html; read it and come back here if you have further questions.

You can also search this forum for "twin paradox"; there's a lot of stuff already here.

[edit: fixed broken link]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top