Time Dilation - Clock running slower?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of time dilation as observed by two observers: one on a moving train and one stationary on a platform. The stationary observer perceives the moving observer's clock as ticking slower due to the effects of relativity, which can be confusing when considering their own clock's measurements. Both observers will actually see the other's clock ticking slower, highlighting the relativity of simultaneity and the absence of an absolute rate of time. The term "proper time" is clarified as a technical term in relativity without implying a definitive reality. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the nuances of time dilation.
Peter G.
Messages
439
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having a hard time understanding one thing about this experiment for Time Dilation.

I have one observer on a moving train measuring the time it takes for light to travel a distance d and be reflected back and one observer who is stationary, watching the same events.

I understand the man on the platform does not measure proper time and, hence, measures a dilated time period.

However, my book says that the man on the platform sees the clock held by the man on the train tick slower.

Shouldn't it be the opposite? For a fixed interval on the watch of the man on the platform, the watch on the train will have measured an inferior time period if it ticks slower, as if time had contracted, no?

Or is the book referring to the fact that the man on the platform sees the time measured by the observer on the train? In that case the watch on the train seems to tick slower because the stationary observer's watch is ticking faster?

Can anyone help me please!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both observers will see the other's clock tick slower.
There is no true rate of time. "proper" is a technical term in relativity and should not be considered to have any special significance in terms of what is "really" happening.
 
Ok, thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top