Time Dilation: Inside a Rotating Sphere of Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter vikram chawan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativity
vikram chawan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
please can u resolve my doubt regarding this ..."What if i fixed a chair inside a sphere and i am sitting on it and it is not rotating whereas the sphere is rotating with the speed of light ?" "Will time be different for me inside the sphere and for the people outside?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But what if i am rotating with the speed of light with the sphere?will the time be different then??
 
... taking "rotating at the speed of light" to mean "rotating with a speed very close to the speed of light": I agree with russ_watters.
realize you cannot rotate at the speed of light, since you have mass.

Further, when you talk about speed, it is important to say what the speed is relative to.
In the first case we can talk about the speed of the sphere relative to the chair, since you specified that it was stationary.

In the second case, you are spinning in the frame of reference of "everyone else" (i.e. outside the sphere), and we assume that "everyone else" are inertial observers.
You should be able to do the math for that.
 
vikram chawan said:
But what if i am rotating with the speed of light with the sphere?will the time be different then??
There is no such thing as "rotating with the speed of light". The speed of light is a linear speed, not a rotational rate (and yes, as Simon says, you can't reach the speed of light, just something close to it...if you have the right apparatus). However, if you were to spin at a high rate (without disintegrating), different parts would experience different time dilation based on the particular linear velocity they had. We have clocks that are accurate enough they could be mounted on/next to a centrifuge to measure that.
 
Thank you so much for the answers...
 
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
54
Views
5K
Back
Top