Time dilation or time relativity?

kaleidoscope
Messages
66
Reaction score
0


Are these terms synonyms or do they actually mean different things?

I see both refer to the same phenomenon but it looks as if "time dilation" assumes the point of view of only one observer whereas "time relativity" or "relativity of time" seems to include all the observers. Still, most literature refers to this as "time dilation".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
time relativity = a generic term applying to all motion physics - Aristotlean, Galilean, Einsteinian, etc.

time dilation = the phenomenon of time "slowing down" IAW SR (Einsteinian.)

That's a guess...


stevmg
 
Consider the Earth as the center of a frame of reference. Have a star 10 ltyr away. If traveling at 0.6 c it would take you 10/0.6 = 16 2/3 years to get there in the Earth's time frame.

Gamma for this is 0.8, therefore the length contracted distance in the rocket ship's time frame is 8 ltyr.

The "time dilated" (the rocket's time frame) would be 13 1/3 years rather than the 16 2/3 years in Earth time.

That's time dilation. Notice that 8 lt-yr/13 1/3 yr still = 0.6 c

I suppose time relativity would be the same in the sense that most interpret scu a situation in Einsteinian or SR terms.


I bet you I got that all wrong...
 
Last edited:
The Lorentz transformation of time has the form t'=(\ldots)t+(\ldots)x. To me, "time dilation" has the connotation of referring to the fact that the coefficient of the first term on the right doesn't have its Galilean value of 1, while "relativity of simultaneity" focuses more on the fact that the second coefficient doesn't have its Galilean value of 0. I haven't heard "relativity of time" as much, so I wouldn't hazard a guess as to its connotations; it might be a convenient blanket term for all such relativistic effects.
 
bcrowell said:
The Lorentz transformation of time has the form t'=(\ldots)t+(\ldots)x. To me, "time dilation" has the connotation of referring to the fact that the coefficient of the first term on the right doesn't have its Galilean value of 1, while "relativity of simultaneity" focuses more on the fact that the second coefficient doesn't have its Galilean value of 0. I haven't heard "relativity of time" as much, so I wouldn't hazard a guess as to its connotations; it might be a convenient blanket term for all such relativistic effects.

@bcrowell. You are way out of my league here (that's my "fault") but the highlighted section in your reply was what I was trying to say but couldn't come up with the words.

stevmg
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
96
Views
6K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Back
Top