I Time evolution after "turning off" square well

Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,032
Reaction score
770
How how can we calculate the future evolution of a particle after the infinite square well potential is (somehow) turned off, releasing it into a free state? Assuming that it was in the ground state before.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you would expect it to, according to the Schrödinger equation for a free particle.
 
Apart from brute force / numerical, is there a nice way to solve this (or to get useful qualitative properties of the solution)? For example, in the absence of ##V(x)##, can we transform the ##\psi(x,t=0)## into ##\psi_p(p,t=0)## and find the future ##\psi_p## in a simple way?
 
Swamp Thing said:
Apart from brute force / numerical, is there a nice way to solve this (or to get useful qualitative properties of the solution)? For example, in the absence of ##V(x)##, can we transform the ##\psi(x,t=0)## into ##\psi_p(p,t=0)## and find the future ##\psi_p## in a simple way?

After turning off the potential, the wave function will evolve as a superposition of plane waves.

Write:

\psi(x,t=0) = \int dk e^{ikx} \tilde{\psi}(k)

where \tilde{\psi}(k) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int dx e^{-ikx} \psi(x,t=0)

After the potential turns off, e^{ikx} evolves into e^{i (kx - \omega t)}, where \omega = \frac{E_k}{\hbar} = \frac{\hbar k^2}{2m}. So for t > 0,

\psi(x,t) = \int dk e^{ikx - \omega t} \tilde{\psi}(k)

We can write this in another way:

\psi(x,t) = \int dx' \int dk e^{ikx - \omega t} \int dx' e^{-i k x'} \psi(x',t=0)

[edit: added factor of \frac{1}{2\pi}]

Now under the questionable assumption that we can swap the order of integration, we can also write:

\psi(x,t) = \int dx' \psi(x', t=0) \frac{1}{2\pi} \int dk e^{ik(x - x') - \omega t}

If we define G(x', x, t) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int dk e^{ik(x-x') - \omega t}, then we can write:

\psi(x,t) = \int dx' G(x', x, t) \psi(x',t=0)

where G is the "Green function" for the Schrodinger equation. This can be interpreted in terms of amplitudes:

The amplitude (density) for finding the particle at x at time t (\psi(x,t) is the sum over all points x' of the amplitude for finding the particle at x' at time t (\psi(x, t=0)) times the amplitude for the particle to go from x' at time t=0 to x in time t (G(x', x, t).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Mentz114
thank you!
 
So, it's essentially just multiplying the wavefunction you have just before turning off the potential with the free particle propagator and integrating over all space as stevendaryl put it.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top