Time for freefall in a varying gravitational field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for an object of negligible mass to free fall towards a massive object in a varying gravitational field. Participants explore mathematical approaches, including differential equations and energy considerations, while addressing the complexities involved in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a differential equation for gravitational acceleration, seeking solutions for the time of free fall.
  • Another participant hints at a related differential equation that has been solved previously, suggesting the need for understanding its validity in the current context.
  • A question arises about the interpretation of velocity in relation to distance, indicating uncertainty about the mathematical formulation.
  • Clarifications are provided regarding the notation and the application of the chain rule in the context of the problem.
  • One participant proposes using the change in potential energy to derive velocity as a function of distance, suggesting integration to find the time of flight.
  • Another participant claims to have solved the problem and inquires about the existence of prior work on the topic.
  • There is a request for references to previous discussions or solutions related to the problem, indicating a search for established work in the area.
  • A participant mentions their interest in extending the solution to multiple dimensions, introducing additional complexity to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of certain mathematical approaches and the existence of prior solutions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the problem, including the dependence on specific assumptions and the challenges in solving the differential equations involved. There are references to previous discussions that did not yield fully resolved solutions.

Fr33Fa11
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to calculate the time it takes for an object of negligible mass to free fall towards an object with a large mass, taking into account that the gravitational acceleration experienced by the small object increases as it moves closer to the big object.
The first thing I tried was setting up a diffeq:

n''=GM/(h-n)^2
Where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the object, h is the initial height, n is the distance traveled, and ' denotes a derivative. After trying for a few days to solve this equation for n(as a function of t, time), I gave up and tried to solve it using change in kinetic energy, which also didn't work. Any ideas? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem has been discussed somewhere on this forum, but I don't remember the title of the thread. Anyway, the differential equation (not exactly yours, but basically the same idea) has been solved. I'll give you a hint:

<br /> \frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=v_x\frac{dv_x}{dx}<br />

You should prove this to yourself. (because it is actually not always true, so you should understand why it is true for your particular problem)
 
I'm not sure I understand why that is true. Is v(x) velocity with respect to x, where x is distance traveled? Is v(x) just an arbitrary name for a function which fits the relationship?
 
Yes, v_x (not v(x), BTW) is the velocity component in the x direction:

<br /> v_x\equiv{}\frac{dx}{dt}<br />

You can replace x with whatever coordinate you want, but wierder coordinates will require more care in determining when this relationship is true. Are you familiar with the chain rule?
 
sure, f(g(x))'=f'(g(x))g'(x)
Ok, so far I am following you. The expression rewrites the second derivative of position(acceleration) as the first derivative of position(velocity) times the derivative of velocity with respect to position. Using gravitational potential energy I have figured out the equation for velocity with respect to space, and I know how to take the derivative of that. That leaves just a single order diffeq. A single order differential equation of the form a'=a*k should have a general solution of the form e^(tk), so then acceleration should equal ce^kt where k is the derivative of velocity with respect to position right?
 
Fr33Fa11 said:
A single order differential equation of the form a'=a*k should have a general solution of the form e^(tk), so then acceleration should equal ce^kt where k is the derivative of velocity with respect to position right?
Are you sure it has that form?
 
Hi, Fr33Fa11!
Your attempt to use change in kinetic energy should take into accout the change in potential energy, equal to GMm/(h - n) - GMm/h. Basing on it you can find the velocity dependence on distance: V = f(n). The time of flight can be found by integration of the expession dn/f(n).
 
Last edited:
I've solved it, and I have calculated the constants that come out of the problem. Do you know if this has been done(it would be really cool if it hasn't)
 
Fr33Fa11 said:
Do you know if this has been done.
I thought we already said that. Sorry, no Nobel prize today.
 
  • #10
I was expecting that something like this would have been done before. Do you have a link to the paper/post where it was solved, I want to see if they have a faster way of solving it, because my work is kind of messy, as is the answer.
 
  • #11
This exact topic was discussed in the threads [thread=243444]Two particles and gravity; non-constant acceleration[/thread] and [thread=246833]Time for two bodies to collide under gravity[/thread].
 
  • #12
They did not arrive at a fully solved solution. I'm also trying to solve it for any number of dimensions.(Where GM/r^(n-1)) is the formula for gravitational acceleration with any number of dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K