A Time Measurement in Friedman Metric: Physically Possible?

exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
TL;DR Summary
If a proper time measuring clock goes along for the ride between events, then is such a clock physically possible as the scale factor changes / increases in the Friedman metric?
If a proper time measuring clock goes along for the ride between events, then is such a clock physically possible as the scale factor changes / increases in the Friedman metric? How could any clock have zero spatial changes for that situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Proper time is shown by any clock fixed as a (quasi) point like object that can be considered a "test particle", i.e., whose effect on the gravitational field (metric) can be neglected, i.e., a "point particle" moving through a given "background spacetime". Then the proper time shown by the clock simply is
$$\tau=\int_{\lambda_0}^{\lambda} \mathrm{d} \lambda' \sqrt{g_{\mu \nu}(x(\lambda')) \dot{x}^{\mu}(\lambda') \dot{x}^{\nu}(\lambda')},$$
where ##\lambda## is an arbitrary parameter of the world line of the particle. Note that proper time is only well-defined for time-like curves (and indeed any real-world object can move only along time-like trajectories) and that the expression is general, i.e., you can use any ##\lambda##, and ##\tau## is independent of the choice of this arbitrary world-line parameter, because the integrand is a homogeneous function of degree 1 in ##\dot{x}^{\mu}## (where the dot stands for the derivative with respect to ##\lambda##).
 
  • Like
Likes exmarine
exmarine said:
If a proper time measuring clock goes along for the ride between events, then is such a clock physically possible as the scale factor changes / increases in the Friedman metric? How could any clock have zero spatial changes for that situation?

It seems like you are asking whether real clocks are affected by tidal gravity (that's what I think you mean by "zero spatial changes"), i.e., by geodesic deviation--the fact that geodesics converge or diverge, so any object held together by internal forces, which would have to include any real clock, will have to have its internal forces change along its worldline to compensate for geodesic deviation.

If this is what you are asking, the answer is that, while in principle any real object is affected by geodesic deviation, in practice it is perfectly possible to make real objects, including real clocks, that are small enough for the effects of geodesic deviation on them to be negligible in any spacetime geometry accessible to us.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and exmarine
PeterDonis said:
It seems like you are asking whether real clocks are affected by tidal gravity
Let me put extra emphasis on ”seems like”. From the OP, it is not at all clear to me what OP is asking. Clarification would be desirable (or just a confirmation that Peter’s interpretation was the intended one).
 
  • Like
Likes exmarine
Thanks for the responses. My question was not about the tidal effects on a physical clock.

It was about how a physical clock could occupy the spatial locations for both events as space expands.

And how do you get from this equation (which I think is the definition of proper time?) (and I can't seem to get the equation to display very well - sorry)

$${(cd\tau)^2}-{a^2(dx'=0)^2}-{a^2(dy'=0)^2}-{a^2(dz'=0)^2}=
{(cdt)^2}-{(adx)^2}-{(ady)^2}-{(adz)^2}$$

to the integral in the first response above? Or please point to some reference for me. I have a lot of textbooks by now, MTW, Zee, and others.

Thanks.
 
exmarine said:
It was about how a physical clock could occupy the spatial locations for both events as space expands.

What "both events" do you mean?

exmarine said:
this equation (which I think is the definition of proper time?)

It's the equation for the spacetime interval in flat spacetime. But the Friedmann spacetime is not flat.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top