A Time Measurement in Friedman Metric: Physically Possible?

exmarine
Messages
241
Reaction score
11
TL;DR Summary
If a proper time measuring clock goes along for the ride between events, then is such a clock physically possible as the scale factor changes / increases in the Friedman metric?
If a proper time measuring clock goes along for the ride between events, then is such a clock physically possible as the scale factor changes / increases in the Friedman metric? How could any clock have zero spatial changes for that situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Proper time is shown by any clock fixed as a (quasi) point like object that can be considered a "test particle", i.e., whose effect on the gravitational field (metric) can be neglected, i.e., a "point particle" moving through a given "background spacetime". Then the proper time shown by the clock simply is
$$\tau=\int_{\lambda_0}^{\lambda} \mathrm{d} \lambda' \sqrt{g_{\mu \nu}(x(\lambda')) \dot{x}^{\mu}(\lambda') \dot{x}^{\nu}(\lambda')},$$
where ##\lambda## is an arbitrary parameter of the world line of the particle. Note that proper time is only well-defined for time-like curves (and indeed any real-world object can move only along time-like trajectories) and that the expression is general, i.e., you can use any ##\lambda##, and ##\tau## is independent of the choice of this arbitrary world-line parameter, because the integrand is a homogeneous function of degree 1 in ##\dot{x}^{\mu}## (where the dot stands for the derivative with respect to ##\lambda##).
 
  • Like
Likes exmarine
exmarine said:
If a proper time measuring clock goes along for the ride between events, then is such a clock physically possible as the scale factor changes / increases in the Friedman metric? How could any clock have zero spatial changes for that situation?

It seems like you are asking whether real clocks are affected by tidal gravity (that's what I think you mean by "zero spatial changes"), i.e., by geodesic deviation--the fact that geodesics converge or diverge, so any object held together by internal forces, which would have to include any real clock, will have to have its internal forces change along its worldline to compensate for geodesic deviation.

If this is what you are asking, the answer is that, while in principle any real object is affected by geodesic deviation, in practice it is perfectly possible to make real objects, including real clocks, that are small enough for the effects of geodesic deviation on them to be negligible in any spacetime geometry accessible to us.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and exmarine
PeterDonis said:
It seems like you are asking whether real clocks are affected by tidal gravity
Let me put extra emphasis on ”seems like”. From the OP, it is not at all clear to me what OP is asking. Clarification would be desirable (or just a confirmation that Peter’s interpretation was the intended one).
 
  • Like
Likes exmarine
Thanks for the responses. My question was not about the tidal effects on a physical clock.

It was about how a physical clock could occupy the spatial locations for both events as space expands.

And how do you get from this equation (which I think is the definition of proper time?) (and I can't seem to get the equation to display very well - sorry)

$${(cd\tau)^2}-{a^2(dx'=0)^2}-{a^2(dy'=0)^2}-{a^2(dz'=0)^2}=
{(cdt)^2}-{(adx)^2}-{(ady)^2}-{(adz)^2}$$

to the integral in the first response above? Or please point to some reference for me. I have a lot of textbooks by now, MTW, Zee, and others.

Thanks.
 
exmarine said:
It was about how a physical clock could occupy the spatial locations for both events as space expands.

What "both events" do you mean?

exmarine said:
this equation (which I think is the definition of proper time?)

It's the equation for the spacetime interval in flat spacetime. But the Friedmann spacetime is not flat.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top