Time operator in string theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of the time operator in the covariant quantization of string theory, as outlined in David Tong's paper (arXiv:0908.0333). The time operator is identified as a local field operator on the world sheet but is not considered an observable due to its dependence on unphysical local symmetries and constraints. Despite this limitation, it functions as an operator within an extended unconstrained space that includes the physical constrained space as a subset. For further insights, applications of this concept can be found in another referenced paper (arXiv:hep-th/0702060), particularly in Section 5.2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant quantization in string theory
  • Familiarity with local field operators
  • Knowledge of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Awareness of local symmetries and constraints in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of local field operators in string theory
  • Explore the concept of Hermitian operators and their observables in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of local symmetries in theoretical physics
  • Review Section 5.2 of arXiv:hep-th/0702060 for practical applications of the time operator
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, string theorists, and researchers interested in the foundations of quantum mechanics and the implications of time operators in advanced physics models.

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,378
In covariant quantization of the string, say as in David Tong's http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0333 (p28), time is an operator.

Is the time operator Hermitian, and does it correspond to an observable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This time operator is something like a local field operator defined on the world sheet. It can't be an observable b/c it's subject to (unphysical) local symmetries and related constraints.
 
tom.stoer said:
This time operator is something like a local field operator defined on the world sheet. It can't be an observable b/c it's subject to (unphysical) local symmetries and related constraints.
But it is still an operator on an extended unconstrained space, containing the physical constrained space as a subspace.

For some applications of this idea see e.g.
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702060
especially Sec. 5.2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K