Time scaing in discrete time variable?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Discrete-Time Fourier Transform (DTFT) of a scaled signal y(n) and the original signal x(n). It is established that for y(n) = x(a*n), where a is an integer, the DTFT Y(e^jω) can be defined in terms of X(e^jω) using a specific formula. However, there is confusion regarding the case where y(n) = x(n/a), as this introduces zeros into the signal, complicating the definition of Y(e^jω). The participants are seeking clarity on whether Y(e^jω) can still be defined under these conditions. The conversation highlights the challenges of time scaling in discrete time variables.
ratn_kumbh
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I wanted to know , if x(n) has DTFT X(e^jw)
then can we define Y(e^jw) in terms of X(e^jw)?
where Y(e^jw)is DTFT of y(n)=x(a*n)or y(n)=x(n/a)
. Because in these cases terms of x(n) are either missed or '0' is padded up, so i think it won't be possible to define Y(e^jw) in terms of X(e^jw). can anybody tell i m right or not?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
continue

OK, i got the answer for y(n)=x(a*n), where a is an integer. Y(e^j\omega) can be defined.

it is (1/a)*\sumX(exp(j(\omega+2\pim)/a)) where m varies from 0 to a-1.

But can anybody please tell; is it possible for y(n)=x(n/a) to define Y(e^j\omega). i am getting confused becoz of 0's which come in y(n) in this case.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top